2014
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2515667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of the Forecasting Ability of Immediate Price Impact Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A uniform price-impact curve suitable for different markets has been investigated, the power-law dependence of the return on the size has been found [39,40]. The empirically estimated exponent ranges from 1 3 to 2 3 [41,42,43,44]. Following the work done in refs.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A uniform price-impact curve suitable for different markets has been investigated, the power-law dependence of the return on the size has been found [39,40]. The empirically estimated exponent ranges from 1 3 to 2 3 [41,42,43,44]. Following the work done in refs.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The price impact against the transaction size has been investigated in refs. [39,40,41,42,43,44]. A uniform price-impact curve suitable for different markets has been investigated, the power-law dependence of the return on the size has been found [39,40].…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the predictive accuracy of the CSR-associated component of delay, we compare the performance of a comprehensive restricted model for future returns containing all control variables as shown in Equation (6) (restricted model) against an unrestricted model to which we add the CSRassociated component of delay (unrestricted model). In accordance with Naes et al (2011) andPham, Duong, andLajbcygier (2017), we evaluate forecast performance using two statistics: the Diebold-Mariano (DM) test (Diebold & Mariano, 1995) and the modified Diebold-Mariano (MDM) test (Harvey, Stephen, & Paul, 1998).…”
Section: Out-of-sample Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, it considers order sizes. Hence, the model is more realistic and significantly enhances its ability for the study of market microstructure theories such as immediate price impacts (Lillo et al 2003;Lim and Coggins 2005;Zhou 2012a, b;Xu et al 2017;Pham et al 2017). The models in Mike and Farmer (2008), Gu and Zhou (2009a) have been applied to understand the mechanisms underlying stylized facts (Gu and Zhou 2009b;Meng et al 2012;Zhou et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%