1985
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2797(85)80119-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the intercalative binding of nonreactive benzohpyrene metabolites and metabolite model compounds to dna

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This ∼6-nm variation in the absorption maximum is clearly above the experimental uncertainties associated with broad-band molecular absorption spectra. Red shifts in the absorption spectra are characteristics of the hydrophobic, π−π electrostatic interactions between pyrene-like aromatic ring systems and the nucleic acid bases ( , ). The increasing red shifts with increasing oligonucleotide length suggest that even bases that are distant from the central BPDE-modified guanine residue dG* can contribute to the hydrophobic interactions with the pyrenyl ring system of the BPDE residue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This ∼6-nm variation in the absorption maximum is clearly above the experimental uncertainties associated with broad-band molecular absorption spectra. Red shifts in the absorption spectra are characteristics of the hydrophobic, π−π electrostatic interactions between pyrene-like aromatic ring systems and the nucleic acid bases ( , ). The increasing red shifts with increasing oligonucleotide length suggest that even bases that are distant from the central BPDE-modified guanine residue dG* can contribute to the hydrophobic interactions with the pyrenyl ring system of the BPDE residue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intercalative noncovalent binding of BPDE to native double-stranded DNA is well-established ( ); while intercalation is not feasible with single-stranded oligonucleotides, other kinds of noncovalent hydrophobic interactions between BPDE and single-stranded oligonucleotides may play an important role in determining the efficiency of covalent adduct formation in aqueous solutions. These hydrophobic interactions are most likely of the aromatic π−π stacking type ( ). In this work we show that the covalent binding reaction of BPDE with small single-stranded oligonucleotides is facilitated by noncovalent hydrophobic binding interactions () between the sparingly water-soluble BPDE and the oligonucleotides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from earlier investigations ( 6 , 7 , 29 , 31 ) have shown that Stern−Volmer quenching constants ( K SV ) obtained from measurements of the fluorescence quenching of BP and BA derivatives by double-stranded DNA are equal to intercalation association constants ( K A ) when the fluorescence lifetimes of the metabolites measured, with and without DNA, are equal. This occurs if the fluorescence quenching is static, and if the fluorescence quantum yields of the intercalated BP or BA derivatives are negligible compared to those of the unbound molecules ( , ). Figure shows Stern−Volmer plots, measured in 2.0 mM Na + , for the fluorescence quenching of the model compounds, BP78D, BP45D, BA34D, and BA56D, by ctDNA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quenching of the diol fluorescence by ctDNA required that, in measurements with DNA, a subtraction procedure be employed to correct for scattered light. In this procedure, the decay profile of a ctDNA blank was subtracted from the profile measured for a diol with DNA ( , ). Lifetime measurements with ctDNA were carried out at DNA concentrations of 0.10, 0.20, 0.50, and 0.50 mM for BP78D, BP45D, BA34D, and BA56D, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collection of fluorescence lifetime data for each of the oligomer adducts required between 3 and 4 h. A previously described blank subtraction procedure was used to obtain reliable decay profiles (2,5,6). The temperatures at which the fluorescence decay profiles were determined are given in the figures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%