1981
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9201(81)90095-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the magnetic properties of synthetic titanomagnetites and basalts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, some materials are encountered relatively routinely in rock magnetism for which the domain state concept is challenging. For example, spin‐glass behavior is observed in titanomagnetites and titanohematites, where magnetic spins of constituent atoms are not aligned in a regular pattern (e.g., Ishikawa et al, ; Radhakrishnamurty et al, ), due to frustration of magnetic exchange interactions. Magnetic domains can be difficult to define across interface boundaries in crystals that contain lamellae or for skeletal crystal forms with irregular shapes (e.g., Harrison et al, ; Robinson et al, ; Williams et al, ).…”
Section: Is Magnetic Domain State Identification a Chimera?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, some materials are encountered relatively routinely in rock magnetism for which the domain state concept is challenging. For example, spin‐glass behavior is observed in titanomagnetites and titanohematites, where magnetic spins of constituent atoms are not aligned in a regular pattern (e.g., Ishikawa et al, ; Radhakrishnamurty et al, ), due to frustration of magnetic exchange interactions. Magnetic domains can be difficult to define across interface boundaries in crystals that contain lamellae or for skeletal crystal forms with irregular shapes (e.g., Harrison et al, ; Robinson et al, ; Williams et al, ).…”
Section: Is Magnetic Domain State Identification a Chimera?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Hopkinson peak in the plagioclase κ( T ) curve with a sharp descent just below 580°C (Figure 1a) is characteristic of SD magnetite [ Dunlop , 1974; Radhakrishnamurty et al , 1981; Clark and Schmidt , 1982]. A possible second peak with a descent around 675°C, the Curie point of hematite, is not seen in the cooling curve and is probably noise.…”
Section: Magnetic Properties Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible second peak with a descent around 675°C, the Curie point of hematite, is not seen in the cooling curve and is probably noise. In the heating curve of the dark minerals, κ is independent of T (Figure 1b), a hallmark of large MD grains where κ is governed by self‐demagnetization [ Dunlop , 1974; Deutsch et al , 1981; Radhakrishnamurty et al , 1981; Clark and Schmidt , 1982; Soffel et al , 1982]. The only magnetic mineral is magnetite.…”
Section: Magnetic Properties Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stoichiometric magnetite exhibits abrupt changes in magnetic properties near 120 K [Ozdemir et al, 1993; Radhakrishnamurty et al, 1981;Hodych, 1986]. Associated with these magnetic changes is the change in crystal structure from cubic to monoclinic (upon cooling of the sample), as well as the isotropic point (i.e., the temperature near 130 K where the first magnetocrystalline anisotropy constant K 1 becomes zero).…”
Section: Verwey Transition and Stoichiometric Magnetitementioning
confidence: 99%