2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.10.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of the Prognostic Value of Early PSA Test-Based Variables Following External Beam Radiotherapy, With or Without Preceding Androgen Deprivation: Analysis of Data From the TROG 96.01 Randomized Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of men in that study showed that pre-radiation PSA nadir of ≤ 0.3 ng/mL was associated with improved long-term biochemical tumor control (hazard ratio = 0.546, p < 0.001), reduction in distant metastases (hazard ratio = 0.62, p=0.003), and prostate cancer-related death (hazard ratio =0.595, p=0.01). [28] Post-radiation PSA-nadir in men treated with LHRHa and radiation has also been demonstrated to be a strong prognostic indicator of post-treatment outcomes including prostate cancer-specific mortality [29,30]All compliant men in our study had a post-radiation nadir of 0.2 or less, and 19 men had undetectable nadirs. Although it is too early to determine whether post-radiation PSA-nadir can serve as a valid surrogate endpoint in patients receiving neoadjuvant/concurrent abiraterone, it is promising that among our group of intermediate and high-risk patients, only one patient (5%) has had biochemical relapse at a median follow-up of 21 months, and no patient who completed full intended course of therapy has had a biochemical relapse.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Analysis of men in that study showed that pre-radiation PSA nadir of ≤ 0.3 ng/mL was associated with improved long-term biochemical tumor control (hazard ratio = 0.546, p < 0.001), reduction in distant metastases (hazard ratio = 0.62, p=0.003), and prostate cancer-related death (hazard ratio =0.595, p=0.01). [28] Post-radiation PSA-nadir in men treated with LHRHa and radiation has also been demonstrated to be a strong prognostic indicator of post-treatment outcomes including prostate cancer-specific mortality [29,30]All compliant men in our study had a post-radiation nadir of 0.2 or less, and 19 men had undetectable nadirs. Although it is too early to determine whether post-radiation PSA-nadir can serve as a valid surrogate endpoint in patients receiving neoadjuvant/concurrent abiraterone, it is promising that among our group of intermediate and high-risk patients, only one patient (5%) has had biochemical relapse at a median follow-up of 21 months, and no patient who completed full intended course of therapy has had a biochemical relapse.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Consistent with dose escalation trials which have showed a lower PSA nadir with increased total dose [7], we could expect the SBRT regimen to produce a lower PSA nadir. Lamb et al [19] showed that the post-radiation nadir PSA is the strongest indicator. Zelefsky et al [20] demonstrated that nadir PSA values of ≤1.5 ng/mL at 2 years after radiation therapy for prostate cancer predict for long-term distant metastases and cause-specific mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This longer TnPSA is also contrary to Kitagawa et al (28) who note that if there is a relationship between TnPSA and hormones, an early TnPSA is advantageous when hormones are used in isolation. Nevertheless, caution must be applied when considering nPSA and TnPSA as surrogate endpoints owing to possible dependence treatment variables such as hormone use (3). Furthermore, large-scale prospective studies are needed to further explore the correlation between PSA kinetics and long-term outcomes after brachytherapy either with or without hormone treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, there is little consensus in the literature on a threshold absolute nPSA value that can predict long-term control, with absolute nPSA values varying depending on the radiation technique used and the dose delivered (3). Pretreatment factors such as iPSA, Gleason score category, and T-stage may also influence the nPSA value (3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%