1980
DOI: 10.1088/0031-8949/21/3-4/014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of the Super-CI and the Newton-Raphson Scheme in the Complete Active Space SCF Method

Abstract: A comparison of the super-C I and the Newton-Raphson scheme in the ccimpletc. active space SCF method.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
363
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 696 publications
(365 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
363
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One method that has been used with some success is MRCI, where the most important CSFs of the CAS wave function are used as a multiconfigurational reference in a CI expansion that includes additional CSFs generated by single, double, or higher excitations from occupied orbitals of the reference to virtual orbitals. 19 This method, however, quickly demands enormous computational resources for systems with many electrons and also fails to be size extensive, although this latter problem can be corrected for in an approximate fashion. 20 In a single configuration approach, the preferred choices for including dynamical correlation derive from sizeextensive many-body theory and include coupled cluster ͑CC͒ methods or, if the system is too large, less demanding approximations such as second-order perturbation theory.…”
Section: A the Casscf/caspt2 Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One method that has been used with some success is MRCI, where the most important CSFs of the CAS wave function are used as a multiconfigurational reference in a CI expansion that includes additional CSFs generated by single, double, or higher excitations from occupied orbitals of the reference to virtual orbitals. 19 This method, however, quickly demands enormous computational resources for systems with many electrons and also fails to be size extensive, although this latter problem can be corrected for in an approximate fashion. 20 In a single configuration approach, the preferred choices for including dynamical correlation derive from sizeextensive many-body theory and include coupled cluster ͑CC͒ methods or, if the system is too large, less demanding approximations such as second-order perturbation theory.…”
Section: A the Casscf/caspt2 Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the excited states calculations, two methods were employed in this study: one is the single-excitation configuration interactions ͑CI-singles͒, 22 and the other one is the complete active space multiconfiguration self-consistent field ͑CASSCF͒. 23 The CIsingles method was used for numerical calculations along the reaction pathway and to obtain the potential energy surfaces, while the CASSCF method was used to refine the key points and calculate the vertical excitation energy. More importantly, CASSCF ground and excited states calculations serve as the bridges, which link the ground energy surface and the excited energy surface.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter start with complete-active-space self-consistent-field (CASSCF) [13][14][15] calculations, which provide optimum (occupied and virtual) orbitals for the embedded clusters in their ground and excited states, and continue with second-order many-body perturbation theory (CASPT2) [16][17][18][19] calculations, which provide the ground and excited state energies of the embedded clusters involved in the Ce 3+ 4f → 5d optical absorptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%