2004
DOI: 10.5580/1a73
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison Of The Verbal Rating Scale And The Visual Analog Scale For Pain Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sliders and VAS required JavaScript to be enabled on respondents' computers. As the availability of technology and respondent characteristics can be confounded (i.e., regarding personality traits, see Buchanan & Reips, 2001;Funke & Reips, 2012a), regardless of the experimental group-even with radio button scales-overall 17 (0.9%) respondents who had not activated this technology were excluded.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sliders and VAS required JavaScript to be enabled on respondents' computers. As the availability of technology and respondent characteristics can be confounded (i.e., regarding personality traits, see Buchanan & Reips, 2001;Funke & Reips, 2012a), regardless of the experimental group-even with radio button scales-overall 17 (0.9%) respondents who had not activated this technology were excluded.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, pain was measured using the Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) (Cork et al, 2004), in which the patients verbally reported their PI perception from 0 (no pain) to 10 (very intense pain) and PU from 0 (not unpleasant) to 10 (very unpleasant). Because we were interested in the effect of music-induced analgesia on functional mobility we also used the “Timed Up & Go” task (TUG) (Podsiadlo and Richardson, 1991), validated for quantifying general functional mobility in elderly population.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pain NRS has been useful in predicting the need for labor analgesia (Beilin, Hossain, & Bodian, 2003). Concurrent validity of NRS has been established by its correlation with VAS (Cork et al, 2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%