1997
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3059.1997.d01-62.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of thirteen d‐factors as potential biological control agents of Ophiostoma novo‐ulmi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variations in tree susceptibility related to different growth rhythms, caused by either seasons or differences in elm populations or clones (Sutherland & Brasier 1997), fit well with the growth-differentiation balance hypothesis (Herms & Mattson 1992). This hypothesis provides a framework for predicting how plants balance resource allocation between differentiation-related processes and growth-related processes over a range of environmental conditions, as it is known that resources cannot be allocated to both functions simultaneously (Lorio 1986).…”
Section: Host Resistancesupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Variations in tree susceptibility related to different growth rhythms, caused by either seasons or differences in elm populations or clones (Sutherland & Brasier 1997), fit well with the growth-differentiation balance hypothesis (Herms & Mattson 1992). This hypothesis provides a framework for predicting how plants balance resource allocation between differentiation-related processes and growth-related processes over a range of environmental conditions, as it is known that resources cannot be allocated to both functions simultaneously (Lorio 1986).…”
Section: Host Resistancesupporting
confidence: 57%
“…In addition, it has a dispersion phase on a large scale during the period of its shoot feeding [28]. The slow growth rate and low levels of virulence of some isolates might be due to infections by mycoviruses, as already reported for Ophiostoma novo-ulmi and O. ulmi [39]. This possibility deserves further studies in the future.…”
Section: Variations In Growth and Virulence Between Isolates Of L Wimentioning
confidence: 66%
“…During the 1980s, O. ulmi was shown to carry deleterious, cytoplasmically transmitted viruses (d‐factors) very similar to those in O. novo‐ulmi (Brasier, , ; Buck et al ., ). These can markedly decrease mycelial growth and conidial viability, reducing the potential for elm infection via the beetle feeding wounds (Brasier, ; Webber, ; Sutherland & Brasier, ). Moreover in O. ulmi , the viruses can be transmitted via the ascospores (L. Sutherland, Forest Research, Farnham, UK and C. M. Brasier, unpublished), a feature not observed in O. novo‐ulmi (Brasier, ) and one which would have limited the ability of O. ulmi to restrict virus spread.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mycoviruses (then termed d‐factors) probably acquired from O. ulmi (Buck et al ., ) reached a high frequency in O. novo‐ulmi clones at epidemic fronts (Brasier, , ; Hong et al ., ; Brasier et al ., ). By reducing conidial viability and mycelial growth, the viruses can prevent O. novo‐ulmi from infecting elms via beetle feeding wounds (Webber, ; Sutherland & Brasier, ). However, following the acquisition of Vic loci and the MAT A locus from O. ulmi , numerous new O. novo‐ulmi vc types appeared and overt virus infections declined rapidly and remain infrequent today (Brasier, , ; Brasier et al ., ; Paoletti et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%