2016
DOI: 10.1111/fare.12206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Three Online Recruitment Strategies for Engaging Parents

Abstract: Family scientists can face the challenge of effectively and efficiently recruiting normative samples of parents and families. Utilizing the Internet to recruit parents is a strategic way to find participants where they already are, enabling researchers to overcome many of the barriers to in-person recruitment. The present study was designed to compare three online recruitment strategies for recruiting parents: e-mail Listservs, Facebook, and Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk). Analyses revealed differences in the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
58
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
9
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once fathers were specifically targeted using both language and Facebook's “target audience” tool, recruiting fathers was relatively low‐cost and time‐efficient. This accords with other research examining the efficiency of online advertising (e.g., Thornton et al, ), although not all research has found this to be the case (e.g., Dworkin, Hessel, Gliske, & Rudi, ). In our study, the efficiency of online recruitment provided the opportunity to “iteratively update” a range of recruitment strategies and ensure our final sample was inclusive of fathers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Once fathers were specifically targeted using both language and Facebook's “target audience” tool, recruiting fathers was relatively low‐cost and time‐efficient. This accords with other research examining the efficiency of online advertising (e.g., Thornton et al, ), although not all research has found this to be the case (e.g., Dworkin, Hessel, Gliske, & Rudi, ). In our study, the efficiency of online recruitment provided the opportunity to “iteratively update” a range of recruitment strategies and ensure our final sample was inclusive of fathers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Participants were compensated using the Qualtrics Panels workforce system, which was the equivalent of $4 for the presurvey and $2 for the postsurvey. These types of online marketplace services are growing in their use by extension professionals (Dworkin, Brar, Hessel, & Rudi, 2016a) and social science researchers, especially to recruit for hard-to-reach samples (Smith, Sabat, Martinez, Weaver, & Xu, 2015), and few differences have been found between traditionally recruited samples and online samples (Clifford & Jerit, 2014;Dworkin, Hessel, Gliske, & Rudi, 2016b). Participants for the original study were invited to complete a postsurvey 3 months later; however, only data from the initial survey was used for the present study.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their study, the demographics of US population were 50.8% F, 74.8% Caucasian, and 52.4% married. Age was not part of their demographics analysis [14]. Compared to national data, we showed similar gender demographics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%