2015 IEEE/OES Eleveth Current, Waves and Turbulence Measurement (CWTM) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/cwtm.2015.7098135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of tilt current meters and an acoustic doppler current meter in vineyard sound, Massachusetts

Abstract: The relatively high cost of acoustic current meters has placed practical limits on the use of these meters in marine research projects. One approach to reducing the cost of current measurements has been the re-invention of the Tilt Current Meter (TCM). Recent developments in accelerometers, magnetometers and low-power non-volatile memory have made it possible to make small, accurate and inexpensive TCMs. Here we describe the design and calibration of the Lowell Instruments TCM and validate its performance in V… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measured flow velocity in the SG was, on average, 0.4 ± 0.1 cm/s during the yearlong deployment. These flow velocity values are below the reported detection limit of the tilt-current meter (Lowell et al, 2015), but are consistent with a previous study that suggested inland-flowing groundwater in conduits within the SG can explain temperature anomalies in the water column (Beddows et al, 2007).…”
Section: Hydrologic Recordssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Measured flow velocity in the SG was, on average, 0.4 ± 0.1 cm/s during the yearlong deployment. These flow velocity values are below the reported detection limit of the tilt-current meter (Lowell et al, 2015), but are consistent with a previous study that suggested inland-flowing groundwater in conduits within the SG can explain temperature anomalies in the water column (Beddows et al, 2007).…”
Section: Hydrologic Recordssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Within the cave, groundwater flow velocity, water level, and water temperature were monitored at 17‐m water depth in the BW and at 22‐m water depth in the SG. Velocity was measured as current speed and direction with a TCM‐1 (Lowell Instruments, LLC) tilt current meter (TCM; ± 2 cm/s + 3% of reading accuracy and 0.1‐cm/s resolution; bearing ±5° accuracy for speed >5 cm/s − with a 0.1° resolution) at 1‐min intervals (Lowell et al, ). Water level measured with an Onset U20 logger (± 0.21 cm with an error less than ±1.0 cm at 15‐min intervals) is reported as the departure from the mean value after compensating for barometric pressure changes measured at the meteorological station.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simple pendulums can be used to infer velocity by measuring the tilt angle of a body suspended in a flowing liquid [ 49 ] and several research groups have developed open water instruments for coastal deployments based on the principle. Examples include the commercially available Lowell TCM-1 [ 50 ], a buoyant tethered sphere [ 51 ], the URSKI float design [ 52 ] and a load-cell based variation [ 12 ].…”
Section: Case Study 2—tracking Water Flow In a Flooded Cave Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons, it is uncertain how the water levels measured in 2019 relate to elevations and floodplain geometry in the 2017 lidar data set described in Section 2.2 and used for the modeling in this study. Additionally, the tilt current meters are typically used for deeper‐water applications and have a minimum required depth for accurate results (Lowell et al., 2015). The study of water in floodplains, particularly in the absence of total inundation, involves relatively shallow environments.…”
Section: Tropical Storm Imeldamentioning
confidence: 99%