1997
DOI: 10.1109/7.570789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of two algorithms for determining ranked assignments with application to multitarget tracking and motion correspondence

Abstract: Recently, it has become clear that determining a ranked set of assignments allows computation of very good approximationsto the data association problem. Several algorithms have been proposed but only two return the k-best assignments in reasonable time. One is Danchick and Newnams' [1] algorithm, which is based on the recognition that determining the best assignment is a classical assignment problem, and that determining a ranked set of assignments may be accomplished by solving a series of modified copies of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let φ i k denote the ith best assignment of tracks to truth in a likelihood sense at time t k . Murty's algorithm provides an efficient method for generating the K best assignments [8], [9].…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let φ i k denote the ith best assignment of tracks to truth in a likelihood sense at time t k . Murty's algorithm provides an efficient method for generating the K best assignments [8], [9].…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An artificial switch is defined as a very brief assignment of a track to a truth object that results from a minimum cost assignment of the set of tracks to the set of truth objects, but the assignment is unrealistic from a physics perspective. For each scoring time, the K-best hypotheses of track-totruth assignments are found via Murty's algorithm [8], [9], and these assignments are connected across scoring times so that the constraint on the minimum sojourn time is not violated. The multiple hypothesis or multiple frame approach to track-to-truth assignment are applied to simulated data and the results are compared to the assignments from the single frame approach with no constraint on the sojourn time and content vectors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MHT attempts to solve the data association problem by finding the best hypothesis when each hypothesis represents an assignment of measurements to features. There have been efforts to make the MHT more practical by restraining the number of hypothesis [2,3]. Another statistical approach is the joint probabilistic data association filter (JPDAF) [8].…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A strategy for generating multiple hypotheses within the context of the optimal assignment approach is to identify the k best assignments and take the union of their respective pairings [6,[10][11][12]. The assumption is that pairs in the most likely assignments are most likely to be correct.…”
Section: Optimal Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%