2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.rala.2018.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Two Herbaceous Cover Sampling Methods to Assess Ecosystem Services in High-Shrub Rangelands: Photography-Based Grid Point Intercept (GPI) Versus Quadrat Sampling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both height and canopy gap may be metrics which need only be monitored when the reclaimed area is nearing bond release. It has also been reported that image analysis may result in difficulties capturing vegetation under dense canopy cover (Hulvey et al ). Our study areas were not prone to this issue and it is unlikely for reclaimed sites in semiarid sagebrush‐steppe ecosystems to have dense canopy cover during the interim reclamation phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both height and canopy gap may be metrics which need only be monitored when the reclaimed area is nearing bond release. It has also been reported that image analysis may result in difficulties capturing vegetation under dense canopy cover (Hulvey et al ). Our study areas were not prone to this issue and it is unlikely for reclaimed sites in semiarid sagebrush‐steppe ecosystems to have dense canopy cover during the interim reclamation phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the accurate CC estimation using the RGB-based sensor, which is equivalent to CC estimation using NDVI, a pixel-wise classification method was implemented; this is presented in Figure 4. As found in the literature, pixel classification methods are considered highly accurate for separating the canopy and non-canopy classes, and they are mainly used to calibrate RGB-based methods [35,38,45]. A pixel classification method based on K-means clustering was used to compare the RGB-based methods that use vegetation indices to separate canopy areas from non-canopy areas.…”
Section: Ndvi = mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plant species were selected based on their medicinal and cultural potential mentioned by informants, citation frequency, occurrence in alpine meadows, and the palatability as described by local inhabitants ( Table 1 ). In each 1 x 1 m subplot, the percent cover for each plant species was estimated to the nearest 10% for each species rooted inside the plot (1 x 1 m%%, 10cm grid points) using the Daubenmire method [ 57 ]. Implementing this method, we measured the cover; defined as vertical projections of vegetation that include the area of a quadrat.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%