2001
DOI: 10.1002/1522-2632(200106)86:3<349::aid-iroh349>3.0.co;2-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Two Ultrasonic Methods for Detaching Biofilms from Natural Substrata

Abstract: Two types of ultrasound applications are commonly used in order to remove bacteria from sediment for subsequent direct enumeration: ultrasonic baths and narrow tip ultrasonic generators. By measuring four parameters (total number of bacteria, number of ETS‐active bacteria, amount of proteins and weight of fine sediment obtained in sonicated juices), we compared the biofilm removal of the optimal ultrasound exposure time previously obtained using the ultrasonic bath with the removal by a method using a narrow t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is great variability in the literature in terms of these factors, and in any case, our design prevented us from providing precise bacterial counts for comparison. Nevertheless, our findings generally confirm those of Torlak and Sert [ 28 ] and Mermillod-Blondin et al [ 29 ] that the association between a germicidal detergent and ultrasonication is able to reduce the bacterial load on the surfaces analysed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, there is great variability in the literature in terms of these factors, and in any case, our design prevented us from providing precise bacterial counts for comparison. Nevertheless, our findings generally confirm those of Torlak and Sert [ 28 ] and Mermillod-Blondin et al [ 29 ] that the association between a germicidal detergent and ultrasonication is able to reduce the bacterial load on the surfaces analysed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The differences between grinded and sonicated granules were found to be significant (p<0.05) for all three parameters tested. As was shown earlier by other authors, different types of US applications also may result in considerable differences in detaching biofilms from natural substrates [10]. The inhibition effect of grinding on the PAO activity of biofilm-derived microorganisms could be explained by ammonium fixation by clay.…”
Section: Comparison Of Biofilm Activity In Dependence On Granules Presupporting
confidence: 55%
“…These results suggest that the reduction in the number of viable cells in the biofilms was largely due to the removal of biofilm. Several previous studies (Zips et al 1990;Mott et al 1998;Oulahal-Lagsir et al 2000Mermillod-Blondin et al 2001) reported that the successful utilization of ultrasonic apparatus operating at a low frequency (<100 kHz) to dislodge biofilms. As seen from our results, in addition to intensity of acoustic energy and frequency, effectiveness of ultrasound treatment is dependent on the treatment time; extended treatments are generally more effective (Scherba et al 1991).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%