2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2008.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison study of porosity and compressive strength mathematical models with image analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the characteristics of cement-based materials, its macro performance [27] is determined by its microstructure characteristics, and the microscopic pore structure is one of its important properties [28,29]. As the hydration reaction progresses, it evolves and affects the macroscopic properties such as strength [30][31][32][33] and permeability [34][35][36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the characteristics of cement-based materials, its macro performance [27] is determined by its microstructure characteristics, and the microscopic pore structure is one of its important properties [28,29]. As the hydration reaction progresses, it evolves and affects the macroscopic properties such as strength [30][31][32][33] and permeability [34][35][36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If changes of the surface and subsurface structure are monitored at a microscopic scale, the decay of decorated rock surfaces may be detected at an early stage 11,12,13 ; informing conservation decisions to protect rock art panels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was also observed in our studies where the increase in porosity Porosity has also been shown to affect the mechanical properties of PMMA cement, such as the compressive strength. Higher porosity has been associated with a lower compressive strength [38][39] . This general trend has also been observed when the number of pores or pore volume fraction was plotted against the compressive strength of the samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%