2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A complete mass balance for plastics in a wastewater treatment plant - Macroplastics contributes more than microplastics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
5
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hildebrandt et al (2021) analyse different sampling techniques and come to the conclusion that uncertainties due to lack of standardized analytical methods may override the variability of measurements among sampling stations reported in various monitoring, thus undermining any possibility to identify clear patterns in the data. A similar conclusion is made also by Rasmussen et al (2021). Ben-David et al (2021), comparing 24-h composite samples with large and small grab samples and analysing the respective coefficients of variation, report that sampling with a finer mesh size effectively doubled the number of MPs found.…”
Section: General Remarkssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hildebrandt et al (2021) analyse different sampling techniques and come to the conclusion that uncertainties due to lack of standardized analytical methods may override the variability of measurements among sampling stations reported in various monitoring, thus undermining any possibility to identify clear patterns in the data. A similar conclusion is made also by Rasmussen et al (2021). Ben-David et al (2021), comparing 24-h composite samples with large and small grab samples and analysing the respective coefficients of variation, report that sampling with a finer mesh size effectively doubled the number of MPs found.…”
Section: General Remarkssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Ben-David et al (2021) calculate the retention rate of MP larger than 20 µm as 95.8% and of MP larger than 0.45 µm as 88.2% at a WWTP in Israel. Similarly, Rasmussen et al (2021), calculate the MP retention rate as 99.6% for and 98.8% for particles larger and smaller than 500 μm, respectively, at a Swedish WWTP equipped with a disc filter. Magni et al (2019) estimate a MP retention rate of 94%, 77% and 65% for particles above 500, below 500 and below 100 μm, respectively.…”
Section: Retention In Wwtpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rasmussen et al [25] calculated the masses of plastics of >500 µm in a WWTP. They showed that the plant load was 202.2 kg/day, of which 73% was retained.…”
Section: Microplastic Fate In Conventional Water/wastewater-treatment...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…road runoff, discharge from waste water treatment plants (WWTP), proximity to urban and industrial areas, and atmospheric deposition (Bergmann et al 2019 ; Grbić et al 2020 ; Horton et al 2017a ; Hurley et al 2018a ; Tibbetts et al 2018 ; Xiong et al 2018 ). There is a growing body of research establishing mass balance calculations for some microplastic sources (Boucher et al 2019 , Clayer et al 2021 , Prenner et al 2021 , Rasmussen et al 2021 ); yet whilst most studies of microplastic pollution postulate some potential sources of microplastic, fewer studies have thus far quantified such releases. As a result, it is not yet known to what extent specific sources operate over different geographic regions, in response to different catchment characteristics, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%