2009 4th International Conference on Design &Amp; Technology of Integrated Systems in Nanoscal Era 2009
DOI: 10.1109/dtis.2009.4938051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A complete solution for the power delivery system (PDS) design for high-speed digital systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [5], the authors show that in the PSO algorithm, there would be a better result if p 2 is less than "1" and p 1 is between [4,10], and p 1 should decrease and p 2 should increase as the number of iteration increases. Therefore, we would set parameter p 1max , p 1min , p 2max and p 2min to define the boundaries of p 1 and p 2 .…”
Section: Pdc-psomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [5], the authors show that in the PSO algorithm, there would be a better result if p 2 is less than "1" and p 1 is between [4,10], and p 1 should decrease and p 2 should increase as the number of iteration increases. Therefore, we would set parameter p 1max , p 1min , p 2max and p 2min to define the boundaries of p 1 and p 2 .…”
Section: Pdc-psomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each solution has its limitations regarding the board stack‐up, the range of frequencies, the parasitics inclusion, and the circuit application. For example Simple calculation based on the charge sharing 2 neither counts for the capacitor impedance nor for the system impedance. In 3 they tried to model the board resistance and inductance as lumped elements, which is not proper for high‐speed boards. The capacitor ratio approach 2 assumed ideal capacitors without taking the capacitor or the board routing inductance into consideration; hence, it results in a non‐accurate solution. In 4 they took the inductance of the capacitors into account but ignored the inductance of the board. Another interesting method is the extended adaptive voltage positioning (EAVP) 5, where they considered the capacitor's placement through the utilization of a 3D field solver, similar to our approach. Two other reliable methods were presented in 6, 7 where the board and the capacitors parasitic are taken into consideration.However, these methods 5–7 assume that the impedance of the power distribution network (PDN) should be kept below some fixed impedance value called the target impedance, which resulted in over designed boards. This assumption is not accurate as will be explained in Section 3.2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two other reliable methods were presented in 6, 7 where the board and the capacitors parasitic are taken into consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation