2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.09.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A complex systems approach to the value of ecological resources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Acknowledgement of the interconnected nature of social and ecological systems (Folke 2006) and the development of a pluralistic approach to value (de Groot et al 2002;Straton 2006;Kumar and Kumar 2008) encourages thoughts of variability and thus resilience. Here, the relationships between ecological dynamics, management practices, and institutional arrangements express the inherent adaptive capacity of social-ecological systems (de Chazal et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Acknowledgement of the interconnected nature of social and ecological systems (Folke 2006) and the development of a pluralistic approach to value (de Groot et al 2002;Straton 2006;Kumar and Kumar 2008) encourages thoughts of variability and thus resilience. Here, the relationships between ecological dynamics, management practices, and institutional arrangements express the inherent adaptive capacity of social-ecological systems (de Chazal et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation of natural resources, e.g. also when expressed through the concept of ecosystem services, needs to consider a broader set of goals that includes ecological sustainability and a societal perspective, alongside a monetary-based economic component (Costanza 2000;Straton 2006;Spangenberg and Settele 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…biodiversity or pesticide use) is challenging due to political, conceptual, practical (technical) and institutional factors [36], but it should be attempted. They will provide a coherent guidance for the best practices that should be defined as requirements for IPM while, at the same time, might be used in cost-benefit analysis of the most desirable policy measures and support programs, based on the identification and assessment of synergies between policy/program goals and their benefits [37]. The financial support of environmentally friendly farming systems, such as IPM, either by implementation of subsidies, by specific price policies or by ensuring a market for these specific products, should play a prominent role in supporting the sustainable development of rural areas and in responding to society's increasing demand for environmental services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conceptually, economically valuing natural environments is not truly possible with current economic valuation methodologies because ecosystem services emerge from interconnected, healthy and resilient ecosystems (Straton, 2006). Distinguishing one ecosystem service from another contradicts this reality.…”
Section: Valuation Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%