“…If morphological awareness is indirectly related to reading comprehension via vocabulary, then its indirect relation would also be shared with listening comprehension because listening comprehension, or discourse-level language comprehension, is a key skill to reading comprehension across languages (see the simple view of reading and DIER; Adlof, Catts, & Little, 2006;Hoover & Gough, 1990;Joshi, Tao, Aaron, & Quiroz, 2012;Kim, 2015Kim, , 2017see Florit & Cain, 2011), including Chinese (Yeung, Ho, Chan, & Chung, 2016), and because vocabulary contributes to listening comprehension (see DIER; Kim, 2017; see also Florit, Roch, & Levorato, 2014;Fong & Ho, 2017;Kendeou, Bohn-Gettler, White, & van den Broek, 2008;Kim, 2015Kim, , 2016Tompkins, Guo, & Justice, 2013). In other words, morphological awareness would have cascading indirect effects on reading comprehension via multiple indirect pathways (morphological awareness → vocabulary → listening comprehension → reading comprehension).…”