2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2007.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive comparison of corporate environmental reporting and responsiveness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
180
0
8

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
16
180
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are consistent with the literature [13,64] finding that enterprises motivated by legitimacy reasons undertake fewer and vaguer actions. The literature would expect that successful enterprises would perceive a greater pressure for legitimisationfor example older, more established or financially successful enterprises [12], while the primary data suggests that it is the larger enterprises that feel that pressure, but not necessarily belonging to a brand or chain.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Our results are consistent with the literature [13,64] finding that enterprises motivated by legitimacy reasons undertake fewer and vaguer actions. The literature would expect that successful enterprises would perceive a greater pressure for legitimisationfor example older, more established or financially successful enterprises [12], while the primary data suggests that it is the larger enterprises that feel that pressure, but not necessarily belonging to a brand or chain.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The area of sustainability reporting, which includes the issue of environmental disclosure, has established itself as a well-studied topic in accounting and accountability areas (see e.g., Clarkson et al 2008;Clarkson, Overell and Chapple 2011;van Staden and Hooks 2007). Similarly, the area of corporate governance has attracted much attention since three decades ago and it has become one of the most studied areas in the organisational field (see e.g., Walls, Berrone and Phan 2012).…”
Section: Conceptual Discussion and Research Propositionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two theories employed by the majority of studies on social and environmental reporting are the stakeholder theory (Roberts, 1992;Tilt, 1994;Llena, 1996, 2000;Deegan and Blomquist, 2006) and the legitimacy theory (Patten, 1992(Patten, , 2002(Patten, , 2005Deegan and Gordon, 1996;Deegan and Rankin, 1996;Brown and Deegan, 1998;Neu et al, 1998;Buhr, 1998;Wilmshurt and Frost, 2000;Cormier and Gordon, 2001;Deegan et al, 2002;O'Donovan, 2002;Ahmad et al, 2003;Campbell, 2003;Ahmad and Sulaiman, 2004;Patten and Crampton, 2004;Mobus, 2005;Rodrigues, 2005, 2008;De Villiers and Van Staden, 2006;Alciatore and Dee, 2006;Cho and Patten, 2007;Van Staden and Hooks, 2007;Llena et al, 2007;. In this sense, Deegan (2002) points out that the two theories are closely aligned and have been used in a complementary way.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 98%