A Comprehensive Framework for Standardising System Boundary Definition in Life Cycle Energy Assessments

Abstract

This paper aims to propose a comprehensive framework for a clear description of system boundary conditions in life cycle energy assessment (LCEA) analysis in order to promote the incorporation of embodied energy impacts into building energy-efficiency regulations (BEERs). The proposed framework was developed based on an extensive review of 66 studies representing 243 case studies in over 15 countries. The framework consists of six distinctive dimensions, i.e., temporal, physical, methodological, hypothetical, spatial, and functional. These dimensions encapsulate 15 components collectively. The proposed framework possesses two key characteristics; first, its application facilitates defining the conditions of a system boundary within a transparent context. This consequently leads to increasing reliability of obtained LCEA results for decision-making purposes since any particular conditions (e.g., truncation or assumption) considered in establishing the boundaries of a system under study can be revealed. Second, the use of a framework can also provide a meaningful basis for cross comparing cases within a global context. This characteristic can further result in identifying best practices for the design of buildings with low life cycle energy use performance. Furthermore, this paper applies the proposed framework to analyse the LCEA performance of a case study in Adelaide, Australia. Thereafter, the framework is utilised to cross compare the achieved LCEA results with a case study retrieved from literature in order to demonstrate the framework’s capacity for cross comparison. The results indicate the capability of the framework for maintaining transparency in establishing a system boundary in an LCEA analysis, as well as a standardised basis for cross comparing cases. This study also offers recommendations for policy makers in the building sector to incorporate embodied energy into BEERs.

The uptake of City Information Modelling (CIM): a comprehensive review of current implementations, challenges and future outlook

“…UBEM is a fast-growing, interdisciplinary research area where computer science is coupled with urban sensing, data management and data analytics to assess city-scale energy and environmental systems (Hong et al, 2020). The areas of UBEM research identified by this review include archetype identification (Deng et al, 2022;Mauree et al, 2017;Dogan and Reinhart, 2017), urban building database development (Deng et al, 2021b;Chen et al, 2019;Monteiro et al, 2018), validation and calibration of urban modellings (Kristensen et al, 2018;Mohammadiziazi et al, 2021) and enhancing operational efficiency of building stock (Chen et al, 2017;Omrany et al, 2021).…”

Life cycle energy analysis of residential wooden buildings versus concrete and steel buildings: A review

“…It is suggested that further studies are conducted in order to develop standardised definitions and methods for LCEAs. For example, Omrany et al (Omrany et al, 2021) have developed a framework for the definition of system boundaries of LCEAs to enable the comparison of results between studies. Assumptions, included components of a case study building, included life cycle phases, and defined boundaries affect the results of LCA studies significantly.…”

Leveraging digital technologies for circular economy in construction industry: a way forward

“…The construction industry plays a critical role in global economic development by contributing 13% of the gross domestic product (GDP) and providing 7% of the workforce worldwide (Elghaish et al, 2022;Bekdas ¸et al, 2023). Nonetheless, the construction industry is heavily reliant on the utilisation of natural resources, resulting in its status as a principal contributor to the degradation of the built environment (Naing et al, 2022;Omrany et al, 2021;Chang et al, 2022). Based on a recent report published by the International Energy Agency (IEA), the construction industry is responsible for 36% of final energy use, 39% of CO 2 emissions, and approximately a third of waste generation worldwide (IEA, 2019).…”

“…, 2023). Nonetheless, the construction industry is heavily reliant on the utilisation of natural resources, resulting in its status as a principal contributor to the degradation of the built environment (Naing et al ., 2022; Omrany et al. , 2021; Chang et al.…”