A Comprehensive Pediatric Acute Sexual Assault Protocol

Abstract

Objective Close medical follow-up after pediatric acute sexual assault is recommended and may mitigate adverse consequences and decrease long-term comorbidities. The objectives are to (1) examine adherence to a comprehensive outpatient medical follow-up protocol after evaluation in the emergency department in a pediatric population and (2) identify characteristics associated with patient adherence to inform the utilization of a medical follow-up protocol after pediatric acute sexual assault. Methods A retrospective medical record review was conducted of patients younger than 18 years presenting to the emergency department from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2013, with a discharge diagnosis suggestive of sexual assault/abuse. We examined differences in demographics, assault characteristics, and medical/legal needs of patients who were evaluated in follow-up versus patients who were not. Results Of 182 patients, 60.4% completed follow-up appointments with the child protection center. Younger patients had follow-up rates higher than older patients (70.2% vs 50%; odds ratio [OR], 0.42). For patients where child protective services or law enforcement were called, follow-up rates were 74.2% and 64.7%, respectively (OR, 2.5; OR, 3.1). All patients with anogenital injuries on initial examination were seen in follow-up. The majority of patients who followed-up were accompanied by a caregiver/relative (95%). Conclusions (1) Caregivers should be integrated into the evaluation to facilitate compliance with follow-up; (2) child abuse specialists may be consulted to facilitate specific interventions and recommendations; (3) professionals should work as a multidisciplinary team; and (4) the patient's psychological status should be evaluated, and mental health interventions recommended.

The Role of Outpatient Care Accreditation in Enhancing Foreign Patients’ Perception of Colombian Medical Tourism: A Quasi-experimental Design

“…The limited application of 1 variable negatively affects the perception of quality. [13][14][15][16] Various authors analyzed whether patients' perception of time quality is related to the duration of a consultation. 17 According to the authors, although participants were satisfied with the time spent with physicians (high valuation of the above first variable), they declared that physicians did not explain their health situation in "easy" way to understand, so it took more time than they would expect (low valuation of the third variable).…”