2018
DOI: 10.2339/politeknik.374830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comprehensive Research on The Use Of Swarm Algorithms in The Inverse Kinematics Solution

Abstract: Bu makaleye şu şekilde atıfta bulunabilirsiniz(To cite to this article): Dereli S., Köker R., Öylek İ. ve Ay M., "A comprehensive research on the use of swarm algorithms in the ınverse kinematics solution", Politeknik Dergisi, 22(1): 75-79, (2019).Erişim linki (To link to this article): http://dergipark.gov.tr/politeknik/archive DOI: 10.2339/politeknik.374830 Politeknik Dergisi, 2019; 22(1) : 75-79 Journal of Polytechnic, 2019; 22 (1) ABSTRACTA comprehensive study was presented on swarm algorithms used i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both algorithms could get the appropriate solutions, but ANFIS algorithm proved to be the best one. The comparison also shows that a number of studies [12,22,23], using optimal algorithms such as PSO, ABC, Q-PSO … handle the inverse kinetic requirements for the model of 7 degrees of freedom. All the used algorithms have proven the ability to handle the problem, but it is not difficult to see that most of these studies have the lower accuracy and processing speed than the ISADE as well as the Pro-ISADE algorithm proposed in this study.…”
Section: Scenario 3 Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both algorithms could get the appropriate solutions, but ANFIS algorithm proved to be the best one. The comparison also shows that a number of studies [12,22,23], using optimal algorithms such as PSO, ABC, Q-PSO … handle the inverse kinetic requirements for the model of 7 degrees of freedom. All the used algorithms have proven the ability to handle the problem, but it is not difficult to see that most of these studies have the lower accuracy and processing speed than the ISADE as well as the Pro-ISADE algorithm proposed in this study.…”
Section: Scenario 3 Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In Scenario 2, the end effector moved through the 100 points located on a specific trajectory that was defined in Eq. (22) and shown in Figure 3b. The main difference between Scenario 2 and Scenario 3 is that, instead of after solving each IK problem for each point, the end effector goes back to the original point to continue processing for the next points like in Scenario 2, in Scenario 3 the end effector starts from previous point in order to calculate for the next point.…”
Section: Scenario 3 Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Its solution enables the robot to realize kinematic simulation and trajectory planning. 23 Because the inverse solution of the collaborative robot is difficult to obtain, the inverse kinematics model is analyzed using a combination of a closed-form solution and numerical solution. The Manocha elimination method was used to determine the forward kinematics, and the key matrix of the inverse kinematics was obtained using singular value decomposition (SVD) and the Newton-Raphson iteration method.…”
Section: Inverse Kinematics Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The firefly parameters used are γ, α, β 0 , and δ known as light absorption coefficient, mutation coefficient, attraction coefficient base value, and uniform mutation range respectively. α_damp is the mutation coefficient damping ratio [16], [17], [29]. The values of these parameters can be assumed using different combinations of values at different iterations.…”
Section: Fig3: Workpace (Articulated Arm)mentioning
confidence: 99%