2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive review of factors affecting fatigue life of dental implants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the research results of C. Cherde et al, when the film thickness on the implant increased, its adhesion strength decreased. When the film thickness on the implant was less than 50 μm, the film had strong adhesion to the substrate and produces fewer cracks, while when the film thickness on the implant was greater than 50 μm, obvious delamination and peeling from the substrate were observed [ 26 ]. Therefore, the thickness of the MBG–Ag–coated Ti film in this study was controlled to be less than 20 µm, which could avoid cracks and peeling due to too thick film.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the research results of C. Cherde et al, when the film thickness on the implant increased, its adhesion strength decreased. When the film thickness on the implant was less than 50 μm, the film had strong adhesion to the substrate and produces fewer cracks, while when the film thickness on the implant was greater than 50 μm, obvious delamination and peeling from the substrate were observed [ 26 ]. Therefore, the thickness of the MBG–Ag–coated Ti film in this study was controlled to be less than 20 µm, which could avoid cracks and peeling due to too thick film.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike pure monotonic loading, it simulates a much more practical circumstance, cyclic loading must be used to assess the fatigue behaviour of materials used for dental implants [89,105]. Additionally, the environment in which implants are placed might affect their ability to withstand fatigue by hastening the onset of surface imperfection and its growth to a critical size, which causes the implants to fracture [106][107][108]. Despite this, there are not many research that examine how Ti alloys perform in human-like media in this situation.…”
Section: Fatigue Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, mechanical strength, stability and biocompatibility are major factors in implant materials, and only a few materials, such as certain metals (titanium, Ti), polymers (polyetheretherketone, PEEK) and ceramics (zirconia, hydroxyapatite [HA]), are used for dental implants as they have greater fatigue strength, reduced modulus of elasticity and improved corrosion resistance. [ 28 ] There are several advantages and disadvantages for each implant material as listed in Table 2. Due to its high biocompatibility, osseointegration and resistance to corrosion, pure Ti and its alloys are currently considered the gold standard for dental implants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%