2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2015.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive review of flowshop group scheduling literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 158 publications
0
31
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Both Neufeld, Gupta, and Buscher (2016) and Janiak et al (2015) provide very good and recent reviews of this classic Resource Constrained Project Scheduling Problems with detailed comparison of the different problems and used algorithms. Early descriptions of these problems can for example be found in Ignall and Schrage (1965); Graham et al (1979); Adams, Balas, and Zawack (1988); and Demeulemeester and Herroelen (1992).…”
Section: Branch and Bound Concept Of Apollomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both Neufeld, Gupta, and Buscher (2016) and Janiak et al (2015) provide very good and recent reviews of this classic Resource Constrained Project Scheduling Problems with detailed comparison of the different problems and used algorithms. Early descriptions of these problems can for example be found in Ignall and Schrage (1965); Graham et al (1979); Adams, Balas, and Zawack (1988); and Demeulemeester and Herroelen (1992).…”
Section: Branch and Bound Concept Of Apollomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of such systems is quite limited ([18]- [21]) and setups are often ignored in these studies. In another direction, setups are typically studied from scheduling perspective in job shop manufacturing (e.g., review [22]). Although bottlenecks have been studied extensively (see monograph [23] and papers [24]- [28]), how to identify the setup bottleneck, i.e., the product type or machine whose setup time reduction leads to the largest improvement in system production rate, is still unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relevance of minimising flow times is related to, among others, improvement of customer responsiveness, maintaining flexibility, improvement of product quality, less need for relying on forecasts, reducing costs associated with work in process, and making better forecasts (Hopp and Spearman 2008;Pinedo 2015). See Mosier, Elvers, and Kelly (1984), Mahmoodi and Dooley (1991), Ponnambalam, Aravindan, and Reddy (1999), Pickardt and Branke (2012) and Neufeld, Gupta, and Buscher (2016) for heuristics addressing due date related criterions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%