“…Despite the fact that highly relevant criticisms of the studies of Brody et al have now been published (Hurlbert and Whittaker, 1991;Laan and Rellini, 2011;Prause, 2011Prause, , 2012; Suchinsky and Lalumière, 2013; Levin, 2002Levin, , 2011aLevin, ,b, 2012Levin, , 2014Miko, Urban, Kajanov a, Pol ak and Varga, 2014;Prause et al, 2016;Therrien and Brotto, 2016;Tavares, Laan, and Nobre, 2017), few authors who quote Brody et al papers (Puts, Dawood and Welling, 2012;Aneja et al, 2015;Mazloomdoost and Pauls, 2015;Fleischman, 2016;Kontula and Miettinen, 2016;Maunder, Schoemaker, and Pruessner, 2017) also append in context these papers that highlight critically, not only their errors of omission and commission but also contradictory findings (see also Levin 2011bLevin , 2014 for further comments). This creates the illusion that their interpretations and conclusions appear to be unopposed and the possible 'canonization of false facts' (Banobi, Branch, and Hilborn, 2011;Nissen et al, 2016).…”