2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive study on estimating higher heating value of biomass from proximate and ultimate analysis with machine learning approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
1
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
50
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Other authors have observed energy density of 13 GJ/m³ in 7.5-year-old Eucalyptus trees (Pereira et al, 2013) and ranging from 1.82 and 3.58 GJ/m³ in several combinations of Eucalyptus and coffee production residues (parchment, chaff and husk) (Tan et al, 2020); the first one presented higher and the second one lower in comparison to the results in the present study, due to the variability of the wood species. Recent studies have shown that the main determining factor of the higher heating value of biomass is the ash content (Xing et al, 2019), which was not observed in our study, where the highest ash content values were not necessarily associated with the highest calorific values of the species.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…Other authors have observed energy density of 13 GJ/m³ in 7.5-year-old Eucalyptus trees (Pereira et al, 2013) and ranging from 1.82 and 3.58 GJ/m³ in several combinations of Eucalyptus and coffee production residues (parchment, chaff and husk) (Tan et al, 2020); the first one presented higher and the second one lower in comparison to the results in the present study, due to the variability of the wood species. Recent studies have shown that the main determining factor of the higher heating value of biomass is the ash content (Xing et al, 2019), which was not observed in our study, where the highest ash content values were not necessarily associated with the highest calorific values of the species.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…A possible explanation is that the ultimate analysis is generally more expensive and time‐consuming than proximate analysis (Cordero et al, 2001). Specifically, 14 papers predicted the HHV of biomass using the composition data from proximate analysis covering a variety of biomass types (e.g., woody biomass, herbaceous and agricultural and animal biomass) (Akkaya, 2016; Ceylan et al, 2017; Dashti et al, 2019; Estiati et al, 2016; Ghugare, Tiwary, Elangovan, et al, 2014; Hosseinpour et al, 2017, 2018; Keybondorian et al, 2017a, 2017b; Ozveren, 2017; Samadi et al, 2019; Suleymani & Bemani, 2018; Uzun et al, 2017; Xing, Luo, Wang, Gao, et al, 2019). The sizes of datasets have large variations, ranging from 50 samples to 830 samples, while 40% of the reviewed studies in Category 1 used the dataset with 300–400 samples and the rest are either below 300 or above 400.…”
Section: Applications Of Artificial Intelligence To Bioenergy Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across all of those studies, nine of them compared the performance of AI‐based models with traditional empirical correlation, and they showed higher R 2 of the AI models than that of traditional approaches (Akkaya, 2016; Ceylan et al, 2017; Dashti et al, 2019; Estiati et al, 2016; Ghugare, Tiwary, Elangovan, et al, 2014; Ghugare, Tiwary, Tambe, 2014; Huang et al, 2016; Xing, Luo, Wang, & Fan, 2019; Xing, Luo, Wang, Gao, et al, 2019). One interesting AI application is predicting ultimate analysis data based on the proximate analysis data, and the trained model has demonstrated superior performance compared with traditional linear regression (Ghugare, Tiwary, Tambe, 2014).…”
Section: Applications Of Artificial Intelligence To Bioenergy Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 (2020) 1-7 ISSN 2548-9011 merupakan parameter yang mengacu pada total energi yang dilepaskan oleh satu kg bahan bakar ketika dibakar sepenuhnya. HHV suatu biomassa dapat ditingkatkan memalui beberapa proses salah satunya proses termokimia, sehingga didapatkan efisiensi pembakaran yang lebih baik [10]. HHV secara eksperimen dapat diukur dengan menggunakan bomb calorimeter [11] akan tetapi metode ini memerlukan waktu dan biaya yang tinggi.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified