2018
DOI: 10.1090/proc/14269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computable analysis of variable words theorems

Abstract: The Carlson-Simpson lemma is a combinatorial statement occurring in the proof of the Dual Ramsey theorem. Formulated in terms of variable words, it informally asserts that given any finite coloring of the strings, there is an infinite sequence with infinitely many variables such that for every valuation, some specific set of initial segments is homogeneous. Friedman, Simpson, and Montalban asked about its reverse mathematical strength. We study the computability-theoretic properties and the reverse mathematics… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [12], Liu, Monin and Patey showed that ACA proves OVW(2, 2). Actually, they showed that for every computable OVW(2, 2)-instance c, every ∅ ′ -PA degree computes a solution of c. On the other hand, they also construct a computable OVW(2, 2)-instance such that every solution is of ∅ ′ -DNC degree.…”
Section: Variable Word Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [12], Liu, Monin and Patey showed that ACA proves OVW(2, 2). Actually, they showed that for every computable OVW(2, 2)-instance c, every ∅ ′ -PA degree computes a solution of c. On the other hand, they also construct a computable OVW(2, 2)-instance such that every solution is of ∅ ′ -DNC degree.…”
Section: Variable Word Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their proof heavily relies on Lovasz Local Lemma. Monin, Liu and Patey [12] computes, using a particular arithmetic oracle, an ordered variable word solution of a given computable coloring c : 2 <ω → 2 (which is an ω-variable word v such that the set {v( a) : a ∈ 2 <ω } is monochromatic for c and all occurrence of x m is before that of x m+1 , see Definition 2.3). Their construction uses a similar technique as Shelah's proof of Hales-Jewett theorem [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One example has already been given by Liu, Monin, and Patey [13]. Another appears in Cholak, Dzhafarov, Hirschfeldt, and Patey [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%