2000
DOI: 10.3758/bf03207795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computational approach to modeling population differences

Abstract: Four experiments were conducted to determine whether the Hyperspace Analogue to Language (HAL) model of semantic memory could differentiate between two different populations. An analysis ofthe differences in densities (or average distances between word neighbors in semantic space) in HAL matrices-generated from text corpora derived from younger and older adults-confirmed that HAL was able to distinguish between the two age groups. This difference was again detected when structured interview data were used to b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence in favor of more elaborate semantic networks in older age comes from semantic representations built from word co-occurrences in text corpora elicited from young and older adults. The representations of the latter are characterized by denser word neighborhoods (Conley & Burgess, 2000a, 2000b). In word association studies, the interconnections between words are elicited in a direct manner, by having participants answer with the first words that come to mind in response to a cue word.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence in favor of more elaborate semantic networks in older age comes from semantic representations built from word co-occurrences in text corpora elicited from young and older adults. The representations of the latter are characterized by denser word neighborhoods (Conley & Burgess, 2000a, 2000b). In word association studies, the interconnections between words are elicited in a direct manner, by having participants answer with the first words that come to mind in response to a cue word.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%