2017
DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2016.0932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computational continuum model of poroelastic beds

Abstract: Despite the ubiquity of fluid flows interacting with porous and elastic materials, we lack a validated non-empirical macroscale method for characterizing the flow over and through a poroelastic medium. We propose a computational tool to describe such configurations by deriving and validating a continuum model for the poroelastic bed and its interface with the above free fluid. We show that, using stress continuity condition and slip velocity condition at the interface, the effective model captures the effects … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scale separation parameter is again = /H = 0.1. The flow reaches the interior seepage velocity quickly(Lācis & Bagheri 2016;Lācis, Zampogna & Bagheri 2017); therefore, a porous material containing only five repeating structures in depth is sufficient for using Darcy's equation in the interior.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scale separation parameter is again = /H = 0.1. The flow reaches the interior seepage velocity quickly(Lācis & Bagheri 2016;Lācis, Zampogna & Bagheri 2017); therefore, a porous material containing only five repeating structures in depth is sufficient for using Darcy's equation in the interior.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present work, a multiscale homogenization technique, similar to that used by Jiménez Bolaños & Vernescu (2017), is employed to link the macroscopic and microscopic viewpoints. Since the phenomena under investigation are inhomogeneous in the direction normal to the surface, the standard homogenization technique needs to be adapted through a procedure similar to that followed by and Lācis, Zampogna & Bagheri (2017). The outcome of this approach is a boundary condition which extends the Navier slip concept and contains in itself the formulation and boundary conditions of the microscopic problems to determine the general relationship between the outer flow characteristics (more specifically the various components of the strain rate) and the geometry of the rough layer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…distance between the filaments) of the surface, and therefore exploit large-scale motions to increase mixing and entrainment. These surfaces are more conveniently described using effective continuum/homogenisation approaches (Gopinath & Mahadevan 2011;Lācis et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%