2013 IEEE International Conference on Control System, Computing and Engineering 2013
DOI: 10.1109/iccsce.2013.6719968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computational model of the infant pain impressions with Gaussian and Nearest Mean Classifier

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research in automatic pain recognition began to take off about a decade ago with the research of 1) Brahnam et al [32][33][34][35][36], who explored classifier systems to detect the facial expressions of pain in 204 static images of neonates experiencing stressful stimuli, 2) Barajas-Montiel and Reyes-Gar ıa [37], who explored classifying cry states in 1623 samples, and 3) Pal et al [38], who combined facial features with cry features from 100 samples to recognize different emotional states, including pain. In the last ten years, research in automatic pain detection has continued to focus on these two behavioral indicators of neonatal pain: facial expressions [32][33][34][35][36][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] and infant cries [38,47]. Little research to date has made use of the various physiological measures to detect pain [37,[48][49][50], and none that we are aware of have involved neonates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research in automatic pain recognition began to take off about a decade ago with the research of 1) Brahnam et al [32][33][34][35][36], who explored classifier systems to detect the facial expressions of pain in 204 static images of neonates experiencing stressful stimuli, 2) Barajas-Montiel and Reyes-Gar ıa [37], who explored classifying cry states in 1623 samples, and 3) Pal et al [38], who combined facial features with cry features from 100 samples to recognize different emotional states, including pain. In the last ten years, research in automatic pain detection has continued to focus on these two behavioral indicators of neonatal pain: facial expressions [32][33][34][35][36][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] and infant cries [38,47]. Little research to date has made use of the various physiological measures to detect pain [37,[48][49][50], and none that we are aware of have involved neonates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, Brahnam et al used Principal Components Analysis (PCA) reduction for feature extraction and Support Vector Machines (SVM) for classification in [10], obtaining a recognition rate of up to 88% using a grade 3 polynomial kernel. Then, in [11], Mansor and Rejab used Local Binary Patterns (LBP) for the extraction of characteristics, while, for classification, Gaussian and Nearest Mean Classifier were used. With these tools, they achieved a success rate of 87.74-88% for the Gaussian Classifier and of 76-80% with the Nearest Mean Classifier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%