2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2006.11.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computational strategy for the regularized 13 moment equations with enhanced wall-boundary conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
97
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
97
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were no explicit wall boundary conditions available for the moment equations, which hamper the use of the moment method in a wide range of practical applications, although the principle for constructing wall boundary conditions was suggested by Grad (1949). The first set of explicit wall boundary conditions (Gu and Emerson 2007) for the regularised moment equations is constructed from Maxwell's kinetic boundary condition (Maxwell 1879). The boundary conditions are further improved for the R13 and R26 moment equations .…”
Section: Lubrication Approximation and Extended Reynolds Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were no explicit wall boundary conditions available for the moment equations, which hamper the use of the moment method in a wide range of practical applications, although the principle for constructing wall boundary conditions was suggested by Grad (1949). The first set of explicit wall boundary conditions (Gu and Emerson 2007) for the regularised moment equations is constructed from Maxwell's kinetic boundary condition (Maxwell 1879). The boundary conditions are further improved for the R13 and R26 moment equations .…”
Section: Lubrication Approximation and Extended Reynolds Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of reports have studied the Knudsen layer with DSMC calculations (Bird 1977;Lockerby et al 2005b), with several appearing in the past year (Gu & Emerson 2007;Lilley & Sader 2007;Mizzi et al 2007;Struchtrup & Torrilhon 2007;Torrilhon & Struchtrup 2008). These studies employed Couette flow solutions to capture Kramers' problem, and we have followed suit using the geometry illustrated in figure 5.…”
Section: Dsmc Solutions For Hard Sphere and Variable Soft Sphere Molementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Bird (1977), Lockerby et al (2005b), Gu & Emerson (2007), Mizzi et al (2007), Struchtrup & Torrilhon (2007) and Torrilhon & Struchtrup (2008) do not report the power-law velocity structure of the Knudsen layer, the DSMC solution of Lockerby et al (2005b) does exhibit the power-law dependence with az0.8 for VSS molecules with diffusely reflecting walls (Lilley & Sader 2007). In Bird's study, the walls of the Couette flow simulation were close together, resulting in interference between the Knudsen layers at each wall so that the Kramers' problem was not captured accurately.…”
Section: Dsmc Solutions For Hard Sphere and Variable Soft Sphere Molementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations