2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-2681(02)00002-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computational theory of the firm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This model conforms to previous findings (Barr and Saraceno, 2002;2005) on the relationship between firm profitability, size and the environment it faces. Environmental complexity negatively affects profits, and the tradeoff between speed and accuracy emerges in this setting as well, giving a hump shape relationship between firm size and profit.…”
Section: Regression Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This model conforms to previous findings (Barr and Saraceno, 2002;2005) on the relationship between firm profitability, size and the environment it faces. Environmental complexity negatively affects profits, and the tradeoff between speed and accuracy emerges in this setting as well, giving a hump shape relationship between firm size and profit.…”
Section: Regression Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Agents within the firm are required to evaluate data and communicate this evaluation to others who then make final decisions. As discussed in Barr and Saraceno (2002;2005), the benefit to the firm of increased resources devoted to information processing (IP) is better knowledge of the environment; but the costs include the wage of IP agents, and, especially, the time costs involved with processing and communicating this information. Barr and Saraceno (2005) investigate how learning affects a firm's ability to produce along the best response function in a Cournot duopoly game with unknown demand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior applications of simulation models in strategy and organization include the evolution of organizational structures (e.g. Carley & Svoboda, 1996;Miller, 2001), individual effort and free-riding (Axtell, 1999), organizational norms (March, 1991), information-processing (Carley, 1992;Barr & Saraceno, 2002), and adaptation in complex task environments (Levinthal, 1997;Rivkin & Siggelkow, 2005;Ethiraj & Levinthal, 2002;Knudsen & Levinthal, 2007). While these contributions have shed light on organizational processes, explicit contributions to fundamental issues of entrepreneurship are thus far virtually non-existent, providing fertile ground for future research.…”
Section: Furthering Entrepreneurship Research By Means Of the Theory mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Barr and Saraceno (2002) model a firm as a type of neural network whose objective is to learn the external environment. The neural network is a particular type of organizational structure that is capable of learning a data set.…”
Section: Information Processing Organizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%