2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-40450-4_49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Computationally Efficient FPTAS for Convex Stochastic Dynamic Programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The framework of [13] deals with stochastic discrete DPs in which the r.v.s are described explicitly as lists of scenarios (d, Pr(D = d)), and the single period cost functions possess either monotone or convex structure. [16] studies a subclass of the DP model of [13], in which the single period cost functions are assumed to possess convex structure, and provides a faster FPTAS from both theoretical worst-case upper bounds and practical standpoint. An extension of [13] to continuous state and action spaces is given in [15]: however, [15] still deals with scalar state and action spaces, and discrete (scalar) r.v.s.…”
Section: Relevance To Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The framework of [13] deals with stochastic discrete DPs in which the r.v.s are described explicitly as lists of scenarios (d, Pr(D = d)), and the single period cost functions possess either monotone or convex structure. [16] studies a subclass of the DP model of [13], in which the single period cost functions are assumed to possess convex structure, and provides a faster FPTAS from both theoretical worst-case upper bounds and practical standpoint. An extension of [13] to continuous state and action spaces is given in [15]: however, [15] still deals with scalar state and action spaces, and discrete (scalar) r.v.s.…”
Section: Relevance To Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algorithm 6 Procedure APXSCHEME1( ) for Condition 3(i) 1: K ← 2T √ 1 + ,ẑ T +1 ← g T +1 2: for t := T downto 1 do 3:F g ← COMPRESSCONVOLUTION( D t , σ D , K) 4:F z ← COMPRESSCONVOLUTION( D t , θ D , K) 5: For fixed I t , defineG D t ← COMPRESSEXPVAL(g D t , (1, σ I I t , 1),F g ) /*G D t (·) is an oracle for a K-approximation of E[g D t (· + σ I I t + σ D · D t )] */ 6: For fixed I t , defineZ t+1 ← COMPRESSEXPVAL(ẑ t+1 , (1, θ I I t , 1),F z ) /*Z t+1 (·) is an oracle for a K-approximation of E[ẑ t+1 (· + θ I I t + θ D · D t )] */ 7:ẑ t ← SCALEDCOMPRESSCONV(z t , [S min t , S max t ], K), wherez t is defined as in (16) 8: returnẑ 1 by approximations. The fact that the resulting value is a max{K 1 K 2 , K 3 } approximation of z t (I t ) follows from Prop.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this paper, we attempt a generalization of the results of Halman et al (2008Halman et al ( , 2011Halman et al ( , 2009Halman et al ( , 2013 for fixed dimensions k 1 , k 2 , and k 3 . By assuming L q -convexity of the costto-go functions, we obtain additive error approximations of these functions by storing their values on subsets of their domains.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%