A computationally informed comparison between the strategies of humans and rodents in visual object recognition

Abstract

Many species are able to recognize objects, but it has been proven difficult to pinpoint and compare how different species solve this task. Recent research suggested to combine computational and animal modelling in order to obtain a more systematic understanding of task complexity and compare strategies between species. In the present study, we created a large multidimensional stimulus set and designed a visual categorization task partially based upon modelling with a convolutional deep neural network (cDNN). Experiments included rats (N = 11; 1115 daily sessions in total for all rats together) and humans (N = 50). Each species was able to master the task and generalize to a variety of new images. Nevertheless, rats and humans showed very little convergence in terms of which object pairs were associated with high and low performance, suggesting the use of different strategies. There was an interaction between species and whether stimulus pairs favoured early or late processing in a cDNN. A direct comparison with cDNN representations revealed that rat performance was best captured by late convolutional layers while human performance related more to the higher-up fully connected layers. These findings highlight the additional value of using a computational approach for the design of object recognition tasks. Overall, this computationally informed investigation of object recognition behaviour reveals a strong discrepancy in strategies between rodent and human vision.