1988
DOI: 10.1002/bin.2360030102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computer‐aided program to supervise occupational engagement of severely mentally retarded persons

Abstract: The present study assessed a computer-aided program devised t o supervise (e.g., to prompt with the display of slides and reinforce with tokens) the occupational engagement of severely mentally retarded individuals.The program was assessed with two subjects who engaged in few constructive activities without supervision. The subjects were capable of responding to pictorial prompts. The results showed that both subjects learned to perform scheduled activities independent of staff supervision. Their performance w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1989
1989
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Common strategies proposed for helping persons with severe developmental disabilities acquire and maintain constructive and extended task engagement rely on self-instruction, pictorial or auditory instruction cues, combinations of self-instruction and pictorial cues, and computer-based systems for presenting instructions (Briggs, Alberto, Sharpton, Berlin, McKinley, & Ritts, 1990;Hughes & Petersen, 1989;Johnson & Miltenberger, 1996;Lancioni, Smeets, & Oliva, 1988;Wacker, Berg, Berrie, & Swatta, 1985). Although positive results have been reported with all these strategies, their use may not necessarily be free from diculties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common strategies proposed for helping persons with severe developmental disabilities acquire and maintain constructive and extended task engagement rely on self-instruction, pictorial or auditory instruction cues, combinations of self-instruction and pictorial cues, and computer-based systems for presenting instructions (Briggs, Alberto, Sharpton, Berlin, McKinley, & Ritts, 1990;Hughes & Petersen, 1989;Johnson & Miltenberger, 1996;Lancioni, Smeets, & Oliva, 1988;Wacker, Berg, Berrie, & Swatta, 1985). Although positive results have been reported with all these strategies, their use may not necessarily be free from diculties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inadequate training levels in the card programme may not be a sufficient explanation for the deterioration of performance, at least for Subject 2. The level of supervision available in the programmes may be a more likely explanation of the findings (Dunlap & Johnson, 1985;Lancioni & Oliva, 1988;Lancioni ^r a/., 1988;Romanczyk, 1977). It is noteworthy that in the card programme the subjects could misuse the cards and take reinforcement without any external restrictions or feedback.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increase in the activity level can constitute a significant improvement in the 'quality of life' of those individuals (Felce et al,, 1980;Jones et al, 1984;ManseIU/d/., 1982;ManselUr a/., 1984;Powers & Ball, 1983). Recently, a computer-aided programme has been developed for supervising occupational engagement; that is, for providing the individuals with instructions, reinforcement and, to some extent, corrective feedback (Lancioni & Oliva, 1988;Lancioni et al, 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a general agreement exists that an increase in the activity of these individuals is desirable, an increase in staff personnel to achieve this goal may be practically impossible (Dy, Strain, Fullerton & Stowitschek, 198 1;Vacc, 1978). The use of computer-aided programs (Lancioni, Oliva, Raimondi & Ciattaglia, 1989;Lancioni, Smeets & Oliva, 1988) can be a viable and convenient approach. Individuals who require physical prompts to be active, however, may not respond successfully to those programs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%