Proceedings of the 7th Euro American Conference on Telematics and Information Systems 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2590651.2590669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A concept and prototype for the integration of multi-channel disaster alert systems

Abstract: In many countries, the responsibility for issuing disaster alerts to the general population lies with different local, regional, or national authorities. These disaster alert systems are usually managed independently and without any automatic co-ordination. However, it would be highly beneficial for system operators (a) to obtain an overview of the crisis communication that other actors have already undertaken, and (b), to integrate as many dissemination channels as possible to maximize the impact of alerts. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in the flood alert, the CAP message can contain several Kbytes, CAP contains too much information for the last-mile users, and the servers have to compress the CAP message into shorter length to reduce the information loss (Tomaso et al, 2012). On the other hand, the next generation forecast and alert systems should contain more data and support more users, terminal equipment, automated workflow systems (Duffy et al, 2012), and alert generators (Klafft & Ziegler, 2014;Aanandh et al, 2015). The current alerting systems such as the CAP contain only the decision and action information, and it does not seek to obtain evidence, while the evidencing module may be important for hazard control and post hazard analysis (Aanandh et al, 2015).…”
Section: Challenges and Needs In Data Exchangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the flood alert, the CAP message can contain several Kbytes, CAP contains too much information for the last-mile users, and the servers have to compress the CAP message into shorter length to reduce the information loss (Tomaso et al, 2012). On the other hand, the next generation forecast and alert systems should contain more data and support more users, terminal equipment, automated workflow systems (Duffy et al, 2012), and alert generators (Klafft & Ziegler, 2014;Aanandh et al, 2015). The current alerting systems such as the CAP contain only the decision and action information, and it does not seek to obtain evidence, while the evidencing module may be important for hazard control and post hazard analysis (Aanandh et al, 2015).…”
Section: Challenges and Needs In Data Exchangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atualmente os EWS fazem um cadastro prévio de pessoas, cujos dados são utilizados para personalizar os alertas que serão enviados [Klafft and Ziegler 2014]. Apesar do cadastro, a maioria dos EWS fazem distribuições em massa de alerta para todos usuários dentro dá area afetada [Meissen et al 2014].…”
Section: Trabalhos Relacionadosunclassified
“…Em [Klafft and Ziegler 2014] os autores apresentam a possibilidade de enviar alertas adaptados para idosos, pessoas com deficiência, famílias com crianças, ou turistas a partir de uma base centralizada de mensagens de alerta de autoridades locais, regionais ou nacionais. Em [Malizia et al 2009], os autores apresentam CAP-ONES, um sistema baseado em ontologia para gerar notificações de alerta de emergência adaptadas para diferentes tipos de usuários, mídias e dispositivos.…”
Section: Trabalhos Relacionadosunclassified
“…Kla↵t and Ziegler [9] propose a system prototype that uses multiple communication channels and personalized messages. It provides message content personalization for disabled people, families with children, senior citizens, and tourists (translated content).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related work analysis shows that [10] and [9] broadcast all emergency messages regardless whether users are potential victims or not. GDACS [6] uses a large area (all a continent) as a potential victim delimiter.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%