A Conceptual Account of the European Administrative Space

Trondal, Jarle; Peters, B. Guy

doi:10.1057/9781137339898_5

Cited by 16 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Her ne kadar bu faktörler ulusal hükümet ve bürokrasileri önemsizleştirmese de merkez oluşum sürecini desteklemektedir (Egeberg, 2015;Egeberg vd., 2015). Bu durum, AB ölçeğinde yönetsel bir siyasal mekânın ortaya çıkmasında etkin olmaktadır (Trondal & Peters, 2015).…”

Section: Ab Ile üYe Devletlerin Teritoryal Yapıları Arasındaki İlişkiunclassified

Governance at the European Union Level and Political Territoriality

Yilmaz

Reçber

2021

Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bu çalışma, Avrupa Birliği'nin (AB) teritoryal yapısını, münhasıran teritoryalitenin siyasal boyutu kapsamında analiz etmektedir. AB'nin teritoryal niteliği, ağırlıklı olarak modern ile post-modern veya post-nasyonel şeklinde tek bir kavram altında birleştirilebilecek yaklaşımlar ve bunların teritoryal sonuçları açısından ele alınmaktadır. Bu kapsamda yapılmış olan çalışmalar da genellikle AB'nin ya zayıf bir teritoryal ya da teritoryal olmayan bir örgütlenme olduğu sonucuna ulaşmaktadır. Hâlbuki bir siyasal örgütlenme olan, belli bir mekânsal uzantı üzerinde etkinlik kuran ve kamusal nitelikte düzen üreten AB, bünyesinde barındırdığı yönetişim düzeyleriyle, mekânsal bir kontrol stratejisi olan ve farklı yoğunlukta uygulanabilen teritoryalitenin bazı temel unsurlarını bünyesinde barındırmaktadır. Bu bakımdan AB, teritoryal olmayan bir siyasal örgütlenme modeli olarak değerlendirilmemelidir. Sahip olduğu yasal kapasite ve araçlar çerçevesinde AB, özerk bir teritoryal işleyiş oluşturmakta ve çok düzeyli bir yapı içerisinde, başta üye devletler olmak üzere alt düzeydeki aktörlerle işbirliği yaparak etkileşimlerin düzenlendiği yönetimsel bir alan ortaya çıkarmaktadır. Bu şekilde uluslarüstü düzeyde teritoryal bir sınırlandırılmışlık tanzim edilmektedir.

show abstract

Section: Ab Ile üYe Devletlerin Teritoryal Yapıları Arasındaki İlişkiunclassified

Governance at the European Union Level and Political Territoriality

Yilmaz

Reçber

2021

Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Another way of conceptualising the EU multi-level administration is by conceiving of it through the lens of the European administrative space, whose main properties are outlined by Trondal and Peters (2015), who develop a sophisticated interpretation of the profiles of the European Administrative Space, and how it has been studied over successive waves of scholarship works. The European administrative space is characterised by three main features: the institutionalisation of some level of independent administrative capacity at the European (i.e.…”

Section: The Administrative Dimension Of Mlg As Policy-making In Multi-level Settingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multi-Level Governance and Public Administration

Ongaro¹

2020

Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The literature on multi-level governance (MLG) and the field of the administrative sciences and public administration (PA) can be fruitfully integrated in order to generate knowledge about “the administrative dimension of MLG.” MLG may be defined by Piattoni as “the simultaneous activation of governmental and non-governmental actors at various jurisdictional levels” and perspectives derived from MLG may be applied to a wide set of issues spanning from political mobilization (politics), to policymaking (policy), to state restructuring (polity). It is along each of these sets of issues that it is possible to delineate the contribution that the field of PA can provide to the development of MLG. To MLG as political mobilization, the PA literature brings insights about participatory approaches and collaborative governance. To MLG as policy in multi-level settings, the PA literature brings insights about the functioning of multi-level administration and the role of a multi-level bureaucracy in policymaking processes occurring in compound political systems; the PA literature also contributes insights on public accountability in systems where decision responsibility is blurred, and issues of legitimacy arise. To MLG as polity restructuring, the PA literature offers insights on the administrative dimension of polity restructuring processes, as well as on the dynamics of systemic change and the change management of public governance arrangements. The study of MLG may benefit from drawing from a range of conceptual tools and models developed in the field of PA. Complementarily, PA as an interdisciplinary field of scholarship may benefit from the perspective of MLG, which provides it with a platform to expand the application of concepts like those of collaborative governance; bureaucratic influence on policymaking; public accountability in multi-actor, multi-level settings; or systemic-level change management. In this sense, the generation of knowledge about the administrative dimension of MLG is an addition to both MLG studies and to the field of PA.

show abstract

“…of the implementation of EU law in the member states (Hofmann & Türk, 2009). The intertwined notions of the Europeanization of administrative law and the Europeanization of administration are similarly unclear, although one thing may be said without any doubt and that is that their understandings and definitions are obviously linked with the concept of European public law, which grew around the administrative state and brings about a common legal space , as well as with the concepts of the European administrative space (Olsen, 2003;Trondal & Guy Peters, 2015;Koprić, 2017), and the European administrative system (Bauer & Trondal, 2015).…”

Section: Europeanizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Administrative State in Poland Before and After the European Union Accession

Dąbek

Supernat

2020

HKJU-CCPA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article identifies and describes the fundamental dimensions and elements of the Polish administrative state before and after the accession of Poland to the European Union, beginning with the critical question of how to preserve the status of a state in a supra-state organization. The authors explain the essence of the European Union, or Europeanization, in the field of Polish administration and administrative law. Analysis of the Europeanization of Polish administrative law is focused on its basic aspects grouped under six headings: sources, cooperation, paradigm (constitutionalization), administrative democracy, scope and depth, and outcomes. Separate attention is given to the notion of public administration, as the widely applied definition of the concept framed by Jan Boć became obsolete after accession to the European Union and required transformation and extension. With language being a key feature of public administration, the text points to the post-accession impact of the English language on Polish administration and administrative law. The article concludes with outcomes of Europeanization on the gestalt of the administrative state in Poland. The general outcome stresses that Polish administration and administrative law operate not only within the context of the Polish state and Polish law, but increasingly within a supra-state European administrative framework and European legal space and European public law.

show abstract

A Conceptual Account of the European Administrative Space

Cited by 16 publications

References 35 publications

Governance at the European Union Level and Political Territoriality

Governance at the European Union Level and Political Territoriality

Multi-Level Governance and Public Administration

The Administrative State in Poland Before and After the European Union Accession

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About