2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.12.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A conceptual framework for dryland aeolian sediment transport along the grassland–forest continuum: Effects of woody plant canopy cover and disturbance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
78
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
78
1
Order By: Relevance
“…But when a grass patch is denuded (as can be caused by overgrazing) and the soil is exposed to wind action, there is a "double-whammy" effect: not only is the potential for recapturing the sediment lost, but also the wind causes the bare patch to generate additional sediment (Field et al 2012). In the absence of disturbance, shrublands may inherently generate more wind-derived sediment than grasslands, as they have greater surface roughness as well as less intercanopy ground cover (Breshears et al 2009). Aeolian erosional processes may also be interrelated with fire dynamics (Ravi et al 2007b(Ravi et al , 2009Field et al 2011a).…”
Section: Wind and Water Erosionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But when a grass patch is denuded (as can be caused by overgrazing) and the soil is exposed to wind action, there is a "double-whammy" effect: not only is the potential for recapturing the sediment lost, but also the wind causes the bare patch to generate additional sediment (Field et al 2012). In the absence of disturbance, shrublands may inherently generate more wind-derived sediment than grasslands, as they have greater surface roughness as well as less intercanopy ground cover (Breshears et al 2009). Aeolian erosional processes may also be interrelated with fire dynamics (Ravi et al 2007b(Ravi et al , 2009Field et al 2011a).…”
Section: Wind and Water Erosionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heterogeneous nature of the vegetation in drylands is thought to be controlled by processes of upslope water erosion and sedimentation, and complex interactions among individual plants and the surrounding soil matrix (Puigdefébregas and Sanchez, 1996;Bochet et al, 1999;Reid et al, 1999;Wang et al, 2007;Ravi et al, 2008). Both the movement and storage of water within shrublands is highly variable (e.g., Breshears et al, 2009). These issues make it extremely difficult to model or predict likely hydrological responses to changes in management or climate.…”
Section: Ecohydrological Consequences Of Shrub Encroachmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16-40% cover [43]), the increased drag and shear stress resulting from the presence of multiple elements may only be partly absorbed by the plants themselves. This results in stress being transferred to the inter-canopy surface, and potentially greater sediment transport [52,75]. In the case of skimming flow (>~40% cover [43]), the increased drag from the vegetation acts to displace z 0 upwards (establishing a zero-plane displacement height, d), which simultaneously extracts momentum from the surface wind and increases wind shear stress above the canopy (e.g., [47][48][49][50][51][52]76,77]).…”
Section: Introduction: the Drylands Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%