In this exploratory study, the communicative process in conjoint behavioral consultation was investigated with a coding system designed to measure two dimensions of communication (i.e., influence and involvement). The nature of discrete speech acts that typify consultants' and consultees' behaviors in CBC (i.e., collaborative, controlling, obliging, withdrawing) and the communicative function of speech exchanges within CBC (i.e., affiliation, distancing, mixed) were investigated. An initial exploration of the relationship between speech exchanges and direct and indirect outcomes in CBC was conducted. Results indicated that CBC meetings were characterized by a high degree of affiliation among participants; however, few significant relationships were identified between the exchanges and outcomes. Future research is recommended to address limitations of the present study and to advance the field's understanding of how communication patterns in CBC may facilitate positive case outcomes.Collaboration in consultation is an area that has received a great deal of scrutiny in recent years. Criticisms of collaboration revolve around several core assumptions of behavioral consultation, including (a) the respective roles of consultants, parents, and teachers; (b) the most effective interactional styles among consultation participants; and (c) the extent to which collaborative interactions facilitate 299