1990
DOI: 10.1177/003754979005400503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A concise algorithm to solve over-/under-determined linear systems

Abstract: An O(mn2) direct algorithm to compute a solution of a system of m linear equations Ax=b with n variables is presented. It is concise and matrix inversion- free. It provides an in-built consistency check and also produces the rank of the matrix A. Further, if necessary, it can prune the redundant rows of A and convert A into a full row rank matrix thus preserving the complete information of the system. In addition, the algo rithm produces the unique projection operator that projects the real (n)-dimensional spa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By employing the rank-one update formula for generalized inverse, the MNLS solutions to all systems of linear equations in the sequence can be successively computed. Like the algorithms in [9,11], there is no need to compute the generalized inverses of all the intermediate matrices in the procedure.…”
Section: Elamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By employing the rank-one update formula for generalized inverse, the MNLS solutions to all systems of linear equations in the sequence can be successively computed. Like the algorithms in [9,11], there is no need to compute the generalized inverses of all the intermediate matrices in the procedure.…”
Section: Elamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Or, one may choose to bypass this linearly dependent equation and go to the next one. The following algorithm which is a modified version of the algorithms in Lord et al [10,11] and which is better from comprehension point of view, finds a particular solution x. It obtains as a by-product the orthogonal projection operator [12][13][14][15][16], without explicitly computing the minimum-norm least-squares inverse A + = A − mt , where I is the identity (unit) matrix of order n. Also, in-built in the algorithm is the computation of the rank r of A.…”
Section: Non-iterative Algorithm For Linear Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be observed that there exists so far no mathematically non-iterative technique to solve an LP. Only in the case of a special optimization problem where we are required to obtain the minimumnorm least-squares solution or a minimum-norm solution or a least-squares solution, instead of optimizing a linear function c t x, we have a direct (non-iterative) algorithm [6,7,9,18,10,12,14,15]. Solving an LP deterministically mathematically noniteratively in polynomial time is yet an open problem.…”
Section: Non-iterative Solution Of An Lp In Polynomial Time Is Yet Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In step S.3, we may compute the orthogonal projection operator P I À H I À A A directly (without computing A or A A using the concise algorithm for linear systems [18,32,19] However, instead, we compute the n  n matrix H A A in Omn 2 operations, c H I À Hc in On 2 operations, the scalar s k in On operations, and the n  1 solution vector x d À c H s k in On operations.…”
Section: X3 Complexity Of the Dhalpmentioning
confidence: 99%