2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2019.112572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A configurational force for adaptive re-meshing of gradient-enhanced poromechanics problems with history-dependent variables

Abstract: We introduce a mesh-adaption framework that employs a multi-physical configurational force and Lie algebra to capture multiphysical responses of fluid-infiltrating geological materials while maintaining the efficiency of the computational models. To resolve sharp gradients of both displacement and pore pressure, we introduce an energy-estimate-free re-meshing criterion by extending the configurational force theory to consider the energy dissipation due to the fluid diffusion and the gradient-dependent plastic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The phase field‐dependent Schmid tensor (α) of slip system (α) is constructed through the regular Schmid tensor P(α) as: (α)false(ηtfalse)=Qfalse(ηtfalse)P(α)QTfalse(ηtfalse), where the reorientation tensor associated with twinning Qfalse(ηtfalse)SO(3) is defined through the Lie‐algebra based interpolation: 11,38,39 Qfalse(ηtfalse)=expfalse[±πϕfalse(ηtfalse)m×false],m×·umt×uu3. …”
Section: Constitutive Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The phase field‐dependent Schmid tensor (α) of slip system (α) is constructed through the regular Schmid tensor P(α) as: (α)false(ηtfalse)=Qfalse(ηtfalse)P(α)QTfalse(ηtfalse), where the reorientation tensor associated with twinning Qfalse(ηtfalse)SO(3) is defined through the Lie‐algebra based interpolation: 11,38,39 Qfalse(ηtfalse)=expfalse[±πϕfalse(ηtfalse)m×false],m×·umt×uu3. …”
Section: Constitutive Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For completeness, the definitions of SO(3) and so(3) are given below (cf. References 11,38,39): SO(3)={AGL(3)|AAT=IanddetA=1}; so(3)={Agl(3)|A=AT}; where GL(3) is the set of 3‐by‐3 invertible tensor and gl(3) is the corresponding Lie algebra of GL(3), which is the set for 3‐by‐3 tensor. When the twinning phase field equals to one, the reorientation matrix represents the rotation operation 180° around the axial vector mt: Qfalse(1false)=2mtmtI. …”
Section: Constitutive Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since the size effect is stemmed from the microstructures and topological features, the classical phenomenological constitutive laws, which rely on the evolution of local internal variables to represent history, may not be sufficient (Fleck et al, 1994;Mota et al, 2013;Miehe et al, 2013;Lin et al, 2015). Furthermore, the size effect also makes the first-order homogenization not suitable, because the corresponding effective medium does not capture the highorder kinematics (Bryant and Sun, 2019;Na et al, 2019;Hu and Oskay, 2019). From the numerical perspective, rate-independent constitutive laws formulated at material points may also lead to spurious mesh-dependence when softening and/or damage leads to strain localization (Bazant et al, 1984;Song et al, 2008;Na and Sun, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%