2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2020.103861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A consistent stochastic model of the term structure of interest rates for multiple tenors

Abstract: Explicitly taking into account the risk incurred when borrowing at a shorter tenor versus lending at a longer tenor ("roll-over risk"), we construct a stochastic model framework for the term structure of interest rates in which a frequency basis (i.e. a spread applied to one leg of a swap to exchange one floating interest rate for another of a different tenor in the same currency) arises endogenously. This rollover risk consists of two components, a credit risk component due to the possibility of being downgra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, even in the absence of counterparty risk, roll-over risk provides an explanation of the multi-curve phenomenon, since the spreads associated to term rates with different tenors are due to the increased funding-liquidity risk over longer time horizons. In this sense, the present work continues on the line of [FT13,GSS17,AGS20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Therefore, even in the absence of counterparty risk, roll-over risk provides an explanation of the multi-curve phenomenon, since the spreads associated to term rates with different tenors are due to the increased funding-liquidity risk over longer time horizons. In this sense, the present work continues on the line of [FT13,GSS17,AGS20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Market makers may offer rates, which cannot be 'independently assessed' in the sense that a mark-to-market comparison to a FRA market is not going to be available. For first advancements on consistent approaches to term-and overnight interest rate benchmarks, we here refer to Alfeus et al (2018), Backwell et al (2019), and to an article by Macrina & Mahomed (in preparation) with a focus on term risk in interest rate markets. We conclude our reflections by noting that, at the time of writing, there is no global consensus regarding the transition to RFRs.…”
Section: Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the fact that there is currently no market standard for pricing an emerging market FRA that is forecasted and discounted under different curves, with the only observable market quantity being the spot IBOR process L y t (t, t + δ) for t ≥ 0. It is also possible, as in the case of developed markets, to define a fair FRA rate process, K x y t (T i−1 , T i ) = L y t (T i−1 , T i ), however one would not be able to observe this quantity in the market (since these FRAs are not traded, in general), therefore this would be a model-implied quantity 3 .…”
Section: Definition 32 the Multi-curve Emerging Market Y-tenored Fomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with the FRA, the fair IRS rate process is model-implied 2 Assuming that one insists on maintaining measurability of the payoff at the IBOR reset time T i−1 . 3 If the y-tenored IBOR corresponds to the most liquid and tradable tenor, i.e. y = y * , then one will also have access to the set of forward IBOR processes L y t (T i−1 , T i ) for 0 ≤ t ≤ T i−1 , from the standard and liquidly tradable set of single-curve emerging market FRAs, and K x y…”
Section: Definition 32 the Multi-curve Emerging Market Y-tenored Fomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation