2010
DOI: 10.1145/1667053.1667060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A constructive proof of the general lovász local lemma

Abstract: The Lovász Local Lemma [EL75] is a powerful tool to non-constructively prove the existence of combinatorial objects meeting a prescribed collection of criteria. In his breakthrough paper [Bec91], Beck demonstrated that a constructive variant can be given under certain more restrictive conditions. Simplifications of his procedure and relaxations of its restrictions were subsequently exhibited in several publications [Alo91, MR98, CS00, Mos06, Sri08, Mos08]. In [Mos09], a constructive proof was presented that wo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
659
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 425 publications
(670 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
7
659
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…, λ(n + H )) and the graph G n,H need not be independent. To get around this obstacle we introduce a new argument which we call the 'entropy decrement argument' (in analogy with the 'density increment argument' and 'energy increment argument' that appear in the literature surrounding Szemerédi's theorem on arithmetic progressions (see for example [29]), and also reminiscent of the 'entropy compression argument' of Moser and Tardos [26]). This argument, which is a simple consequence of the Shannon entropy inequalities, can be viewed as a quantitative version of the standard subadditivity argument that establishes the existence of Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy in topological dynamical systems; it allows one to select a scale parameter H (in some suitable range [H − , H + ]) for which the sequence (λ(n + 1), .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, λ(n + H )) and the graph G n,H need not be independent. To get around this obstacle we introduce a new argument which we call the 'entropy decrement argument' (in analogy with the 'density increment argument' and 'energy increment argument' that appear in the literature surrounding Szemerédi's theorem on arithmetic progressions (see for example [29]), and also reminiscent of the 'entropy compression argument' of Moser and Tardos [26]). This argument, which is a simple consequence of the Shannon entropy inequalities, can be viewed as a quantitative version of the standard subadditivity argument that establishes the existence of Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy in topological dynamical systems; it allows one to select a scale parameter H (in some suitable range [H − , H + ]) for which the sequence (λ(n + 1), .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second proof we present here, finally, is a fully constructive version published by Moser and Tardos [12] which does not suffer from any gap to the existential version anymore. While it is general enough so as to apply to many applications of the Local Lemma, we will formulate it in terms of satisfiability here.…”
Section: Local Lemma In Terms Of Sat -Proof and Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The basic technique we use dates back to Beck's seminal paper [4] in which he showed how to convert some applications of the Local Lemma into efficient algorithms. We remark that the recent work by Moser [21] and Moser and Tardos [22] would also apply to the first two phases of our procedure (and, in fact, would yield much simpler algorithms with no loss in the constants) but it does not seem to apply to the third stage.…”
Section: Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 91%