2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2009.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A contact domain method for large deformation frictional contact problems. Part 2: Numerical aspects

Abstract: Continuació de l'article "A contact domain method for large deformation frictional contact problems. Part 1: Theoretical basis" publicat a la revista Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 198, #33-36, July 2009, p. 2591-2606This second part of the work describes the numerical aspects of the developed contact domain method for large deformation frictional contact problems. The theoretical basis of this contact method is detailed in\ud the first part of this work. Starting from this, the pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the case with friction, the curves shown in Fig. 12 exhibit the characteristic form found in previously published results [10,13]. Nevertheless, there are important quantitative differences.…”
supporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding the case with friction, the curves shown in Fig. 12 exhibit the characteristic form found in previously published results [10,13]. Nevertheless, there are important quantitative differences.…”
supporting
confidence: 59%
“…An indenter with a circular arc shaped bottom edge is pressed against a rectangular block and is forced to slide along the block length. This example can also be found, for instance, in [10] and [13]. Fig.…”
Section: Shallow Ironingmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Moreover, the use of Lagrange multipliers delivers a non-positive system and additional degrees of freedom are introduced. There are many studies that deal with these issues and propose solutions on how to choose L h [14][15][16]; further alternative formulations such as Nitsche's method or stabilized Lagrange multipliers, respectively, have also been advocated [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. For our purpose of benchmark testing, the classic Lagrange multiplier approach works nicely as we can control L h a-priori.…”
Section: Extended Finite Element Methods (X-fem)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Granular-tool friction-contact conditions are imposed using the so-called Contact Domain Method described in Oliver [31], Hartmann [32] in which interacting portions of contacting bodies are identified via an interface mesh. The interface mesh, having zero thickness, has the same dimension as the contacting bodies, and provides a complete, continuous and non-overlapping, pairing of the contact surfaces.…”
Section: Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%