2016
DOI: 10.1017/fms.2016.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Contact Invariant in Sutured Monopole Homology

Abstract: We define an invariant of contact 3-manifolds with convex boundary using Kronheimer and Mrowka's sutured monopole Floer homology theory (SHM). Our invariant can be viewed as a generalization of Kronheimer and Mrowka's contact invariant for closed contact 3-manifolds and as the monopole Floer analogue of Honda, Kazez, and Matić's contact invariant in sutured Heegaard Floer homology (SFH). In the process of defining our invariant, we construct maps on SHM associated to contact handle attachments, analogous to th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
159
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(206 reference statements)
2
159
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 We also show that this contact invariant behaves naturally with respect to the contact handle attachment maps, per the following (stated later as Theorem 4.8).…”
Section: Instanton Floer Homology and Contact Structuresmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…1 We also show that this contact invariant behaves naturally with respect to the contact handle attachment maps, per the following (stated later as Theorem 4.8).…”
Section: Instanton Floer Homology and Contact Structuresmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Among these are the following two results (stated later as Theorems 4.10 and 4.12). Interestingly, the proofs of both theorems below are substantially different from those of their counterparts in [1] in the sutured monopole homology setting.For the next theorem, suppose (Y, ξ) is a closed contact 3-manifold and let Y (n) denote the sutured manifold obtained by removing n disjoint Darboux balls for any n ≥ 1.As we shall see, the corollary below (stated later as Corollary 4.13) follows from Theorems 1.4 and 1.2. Note that one needs some kind of naturality for a statement like that in Conjecture 1.6 since "linear independence" has little meaning if elements are only well-defined up to isomorphism.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations