2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A contemporary analysis of outcomes for operative repair of type A aortic dissection in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
85
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
9
85
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, obstacles to the centralization of ATAAD care include the inability to diagnose ATAAD in the prehospital setting, the timeliness of transfer and operation in unstable patients, and the scarcity of high-volume aortic centers in the United States. The latter argument is perhaps the most salient, as studies from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database suggest only 15-20 centers in the United States meet high-volume criteria and perform more than 11-13 ATAAD repairs per year (4)(5)(6). This number is currently about half the number required to allow for one high-volume aortic center for every 5 to 10 million individuals in the United States, or the number predicted to allow most patients diagnosed with ATAAD to reach a referent thoracic aortic center within one to two hours (13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, obstacles to the centralization of ATAAD care include the inability to diagnose ATAAD in the prehospital setting, the timeliness of transfer and operation in unstable patients, and the scarcity of high-volume aortic centers in the United States. The latter argument is perhaps the most salient, as studies from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database suggest only 15-20 centers in the United States meet high-volume criteria and perform more than 11-13 ATAAD repairs per year (4)(5)(6). This number is currently about half the number required to allow for one high-volume aortic center for every 5 to 10 million individuals in the United States, or the number predicted to allow most patients diagnosed with ATAAD to reach a referent thoracic aortic center within one to two hours (13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair is perhaps the most unpredictable and morbid operation in cardiothoracic surgery, and several studies have shown that mortality rates following ATAAD repair are reduced when operations are performed by high-volume surgeons and high-volume centers (4)(5)(6). Although regional networks for the rapid triage and transfer of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (7,8) and trauma patients to specialized centers are well established, ATAAD patients are less amenable to centralization than other emergent/unstable patients due to the inability to diagnose ATAAD in the prehospital setting and the exceedingly small number of high-volume aortic dissection centers in the United States (4)(5)(6). Nonetheless, centralization of acute aortic dissection (AAD) care is an emerging focus of national quality improvement in cardiovascular medicine and likely offers the single best opportunity to improve outcomes from this challenging disease (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16), aside from prevention (17)(18)(19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any leaks are repaired at this stage. In-hospital mortality after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection in the United States has been reported to be 21 [1995][1996][1997][1998][1999][2000][2001][2002][2003]]-26% [2003][2004][2005][2006][2007][2008] in two studies based on the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (14,15). Due to techniques described above and improvements in perioperative care, the acute mortality for 889 patients presenting (from 2000-2014) with acute aortic syndrome of the ascending aorta at our institution was 5-10% (16).…”
Section: Aortic Root Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal surgical management is still an open question and several issues remain under debate. Emergency surgery is the mainstay of therapy but hospital mortality still ranges from 15% to 30% (1)(2)(3)(4). Given the high risk profile of patients with acute aortic dissection and the technical complexity of the necessary interventions, a conservative tear-oriented aortic replacement (more often a supra-coronary ascending/ hemiarch replacement) with commissural resuspension and re-establishment of the dominant blood flow in the distal true lumen currently represents the most common surgical approach.…”
Section: Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%