2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.11.047
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Contemporary Picture of Enterococcal Endocarditis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
2
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
34
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…collected prospectively from 35 centers in Spain, recurrence was significantly higher in cases of infective endocarditis caused by Enterococcus spp. (3.5% vs. 1.7%) [28]. There were nine reported cases of E. hirae urinary tract infections with no recurrences or deaths.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…collected prospectively from 35 centers in Spain, recurrence was significantly higher in cases of infective endocarditis caused by Enterococcus spp. (3.5% vs. 1.7%) [28]. There were nine reported cases of E. hirae urinary tract infections with no recurrences or deaths.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The characteristics of the GAMES (Grupos de Apoyo para el Manejo de la Endocarditis en ESpaña) cohort, collection of data variables through a specific central registration depository (CRD), and general definitions are described elsewhere [ 12 , 13 ]. Sepsis and septic shock developing once patients were admitted to the hospital and occurring before cardiac surgery were prospectively collected in the GAMES CRD by physicians in charge of the Endocarditis Team in each collaborating center according to definitions by international consensus in place [ 14 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, while enterococci are also common residents of the oral cavity and an important cause of endodontic disease – and despite the persistent expectation that oral enterococci would turn out to be a common nidus for endocarditis – cohort analysis has not shown oral cavity infections to be common factors in IE. For example, in a recent large cohort Spanish study comparing enterococcal IE (516 patients) and non-enterococcal IE cases (3,308 patients), only 1.6% of enterococcal cases could be assigned an oral origin vs 6.7% of non-enterococcal cases ( Pericàs et al., 2020 ).…”
Section: Drivers Of E Faecalis Bacteremiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past twenty years, enterococci have continued their emergence as important healthcare-associated pathogens. This development is likely multifactorial and has been driven, in part, by improved diagnostics, an aging population, increasingly invasive medical procedures, and further spread of antibiotic resistance ( Fernández-Hidalgo et al., 2020 ; Pericàs et al., 2020 ; Shah et al., 2020 ; Escolà-Vergé et al., 2021 ). The same time period also marked an explosion of research in the general field of bacterial biofilms ( Parsek and Fuqua, 2004 ; Haussler and Parsek, 2010 ; Haussler and Fuqua, 2013 ; Visick et al., 2016 ; Høiby, 2017 ; Fuqua et al., 2019 ), the publication of full genome sequences for E. faecalis V583 ( Paulsen et al., 2003 ), OG1RF ( Bourgogne et al., 2008 ), and dozens of other strains ( Palmer et al., 2010 ), as well as the development of improved tools for the genetic study of E. faecalis ( Kristich et al., 2005 ; Kristich et al., 2007 ; Kristich et al., 2008 ; Ballering et al., 2009 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%