A Content Analysis of Educational Technology Research in 2011

Kılıç-Çakmak, Ebru; Çebi, Ayça; Mihçi, Pınar; Günbatar, Mustafa Serkan; Akçayır, Murat

doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.010

Cited by 21 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The articles having <= 10 sample size are less in number. Similar studies found the same results Göktaş et al, 2012;Kiliç-Çakmak et al, 2013;Küçük et al, 2013). Increasing the sample size can help studies be free from error and increase their generalizability.…”

supporting

confidence: 68%

“…This form which was subsequently revised and developed, and named as "Article Review Form (ARF/MIF)" by Kiliç-Çakmak et al (2013), was used as the data collection tool of the study.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This is followed by undergraduate students at education faculties. There are studies which found that mainly undergraduate students have been included in the researches (Latchem, 2006;Şimşek et al, 2008;Alper and Gülbahar, 2009;Sert, 2010;Bozkaya, Aydın and Kumtepe, 2012;Kiliç-Çakmak et al, 2013). Küçük et al (2013) stated that mostly teacher candidates had been included in the sample, and this was followed by undergraduate students at other fields.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

2014 Yılında Eğitim Teknolojileri Alanındaki Yayımlanan Makalelerin İncelenmesi

Çakmak¹,

Özüdoğru²,

Bozkurt³

et al. 2016

Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram Ve Uygulama

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bu çalışmanın amacı, 2014 yılına ait Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) kapsamındaki eğitim teknolojileri alanında önde gelen uluslararası sekiz dergideki makalelerin içerik analizi yöntemiyle incelenmesidir. Araştırmada "Eğitim Teknolojileri Yayın Sınıflama Formu" adı ile Sözbilir ve Kutu (2008), Masood (2004, Reeves (1995) çalışmalarından yararlanılarak Göktaş vd. (2012) tarafından geliştirilip, ardından Kiliç-Çakmak vd. (2013)'ın üzerinde bazı değişiklikler yaparak "Makale İnceleme Formu (MİF) (Article Review Form)" olarak adlandırdıkları veri toplama aracı kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçları incelendiğinde makalelerde; yöntem olarak en çok "nicel yöntem", veri toplama aracı olarak en çok "anket", veri toplama yöntemi olarak en çok "klasik", örneklem seçimi olarak en çok "kolay ulaşılabilir örneklem", örneklem sayısı olarak en çok "31-100 aralığı", örneklem düzeyi olarak en çok eğitim fakültesi dışındaki fakültelerde "lisans (diğer)", örneklem türü olarak en çok fen, matematik, sosyal dışındaki "diğer", veri analiz yöntemi olarak en çok "kestirimsel analiz" yönteminin daha çok tercih edildiği ve "öğretim tasarımı" ve "eğitimde bilişim teknolojileri" konularının ise en çok incelenen konular olduğunu görülmüştür.

show abstract

supporting

confidence: 68%

“…This form which was subsequently revised and developed, and named as "Article Review Form (ARF/MIF)" by Kiliç-Çakmak et al (2013), was used as the data collection tool of the study.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

2014 Yılında Eğitim Teknolojileri Alanındaki Yayımlanan Makalelerin İncelenmesi

Çakmak¹,

Özüdoğru²,

Bozkurt³

et al. 2016

Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram Ve Uygulama

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The other possible reason behind the dominance of quantitative methods in ET research was the orientation of top journals in the field towards positivist paradigm according to the interviewed participants of the present study. This finding is also supported by the trend analysis studies conducted by Kilic‐Cakmak, Cebi, Mihci, Gunbatar, and Akcayir () and Masood (). The informants of the present study argued that academic journals still promote quantitative methods, particularly experimental methods and they desire to see advanced statistical analyses in submitted manuscripts to be the most acceptable.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 76%

Educational technology research trends in Turkey from a critical perspective: An analysis of postgraduate theses

Aydemir¹,

Can²

2019

Brit J Educational Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study is to explore the research trends in the context of postgraduate programmes in the field of Educational Technology (ET) in Turkey between 1996 and 2016, and to uncover the possible factors that influence these trends from the perspective of ET faculty members. This study was informed by critical theory and employed the critical inquiry method. In the first phase, content analysis technique was used in order to explore trends in research methods and topics in theses completed in ET postgraduate programmes in Turkey. In the second phase, in‐depth interviews were conducted with 11 faculty members regarding the possible influential factors. The findings of the content analysis indicated that ET research was dominated by quantitative research designs in the examined theses. Critical methods were overlooked and social, cultural, and political issues were largely silenced. The findings of the interviews showed that the factors that have been influential on ET research trends were the social impact of the research, personal interests and skills, disciplinary and departmental culture, and feasibility concerns. This study presents implications for better ET research by addressing blind spots of the field and providing suggestions for ET postgraduate students, ET scholars, policymakers and practitioners in a global context and other developing countries since the resulting trends in Turkey were found similar to international trends in the field.

show abstract

“…Yurtiçindeki alanyazına bakıldığında, eğitim bilimleri alanında çeşitli makale, bildiri ve lisansüstü tezlerinin içerik analizi yöntemiyle incelendiği görülmektedir (Arık ve Türkmen, 2009;Bektaş, Dündar ve Ceylan, 2013;Çiltaş, 2012;Çiltaş, Güler ve Sözbilir, 2012;Doğru, Gençosman, Ataalkın ve Şeker, 2012;Gökçek, Babacan, Kangal, Çakır ve Kül, 2013;Göktaş ve ark., 2012;Gülbahar ve Alper, 2009;Karadağ, 2009;Kılıç Çakmak, Çebi, Mihçi, Günbatar ve Akçayir, 2013;Saban, 2009). Ancak ölçek uyarlama ve ölçek geliştirme konulu makalelerin incelendiği sadece iki çalışmaya rastlanmıştır (Acar Güvendir ve Özer Özkan, 2015;Çüm ve Koç, 2013).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

A Review of Articles Concerning Scale Adaptation in the Field of Education

Öztürk

Eroğlu

Kelecioğlu

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A Content Analysis of Educational Technology Research in 2011

Cited by 21 publications

References 2 publications

2014 Yılında Eğitim Teknolojileri Alanındaki Yayımlanan Makalelerin İncelenmesi

2014 Yılında Eğitim Teknolojileri Alanındaki Yayımlanan Makalelerin İncelenmesi

Educational technology research trends in Turkey from a critical perspective: An analysis of postgraduate theses

A Review of Articles Concerning Scale Adaptation in the Field of Education

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About