“…Further, HACLFOA is compared with PSO, FOA, QPSO and IDPSO Fitness values and Computation time | The proposed HACLFOA has strongest global convergence ability among the compared algorithms thereby have a great potential in the image processing field | 65 | Thresholding Heuristic (TH) embedded into WOA, GWO and PSO (WOA-TH, GWO-TH, and PSO-TH) | Otsu’s thresholding | Bohat and Arya ( 2019 ) | Standard Gray Scale Images | Proposed method is compared with their respective base algorithm WOA, GWO and PSO | Mean Fitness values, MSSIM and Mean Execution Time | The proposed WOA-TH, GWO-TH and PSO-TH algorithms are better with improved computational time when compared with their respective base algorithm |
66 | Adaptive Differential Evolution with Levy Distribution (ALDE) | Otsu’s thresholding | Tarkhaneh and Shen ( 2019 ) | MRI: Medical Images | Proposed method is compared with SDE, BDE and hjDE | PSNR and SSIM | The proposed ALDE when equated with the benchmark algorithm performs better and has the capability to attain optimal threshold at a judicious computational cost |
67 | Sigmoid based optimal threshold selection technique with Differential Evolution (DE) and Tsallis Fuzzy | Tsallis-Fuzzy Entropy | Raj et al ( 2019 ) | Standard Color Images | Proposed method is compared with PLBA, BFO, MBFO and BA | PSNR, SSIM, SNR and CPU time | The proposed method is more stable and converges to optimal thresholds much faster. Standard deviation values further suggest that the proposed method is highly robust when compared with other algorithms |
68 | Energy-Masi using Moth Swarm Algorithm (MASI-ENG-MSA) | Energy-Masi entropy | Bhandari and Rahul ( 2019 ) | Standard Color Images | Proposed method is compared with MASI-DA, MASI-SCA, MASI-WOA, MASI-GOA, MASI-MSA, MASI-ENG-DA, MASI-ENG-SCA, MASI-ENG-WOA and MASI-ENG-GOA | ME, Entropy, MSE, PSNR, SSIM and FSIM | The proposed MASI-ENG-MSA in regard to the parameters such as threshold quality and computational cost outperforms other algorithms |
…”