2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2012.02.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A continuously differentiable upwinding scheme for the simulation of fluid flow problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The emphasis of this article are the following: (i) to introduce a simple upwinding scheme for the treatment of (linear and nonlinear) convective terms, with particular care to ensure boundedness and robustness; (ii) to perform a comparative study of the ADBQUICKEST, CUBISTA, WACEB, TOPUS, SDPUS‐C1, and EPUS schemes to solve standard conservation laws; and (iii) to document results for complex fluid dynamics problems encountered in practical engineering applications. In particular, this study can be regarded as an extension to that by Lima et al and a generalization of Lin and Chieng for numerical approximation of convection terms. The selected test cases are the following: (i) advection of scalars; (ii) interaction of colliding shock waves in gases; (iii) circular hydraulic jump in a Newtonian fluid; (iv) Newtonian and non‐Newtonian lid‐driven cavity flows; and (v) a gas‐solid flow in a bubbling fluidized bed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The emphasis of this article are the following: (i) to introduce a simple upwinding scheme for the treatment of (linear and nonlinear) convective terms, with particular care to ensure boundedness and robustness; (ii) to perform a comparative study of the ADBQUICKEST, CUBISTA, WACEB, TOPUS, SDPUS‐C1, and EPUS schemes to solve standard conservation laws; and (iii) to document results for complex fluid dynamics problems encountered in practical engineering applications. In particular, this study can be regarded as an extension to that by Lima et al and a generalization of Lin and Chieng for numerical approximation of convection terms. The selected test cases are the following: (i) advection of scalars; (ii) interaction of colliding shock waves in gases; (iii) circular hydraulic jump in a Newtonian fluid; (iv) Newtonian and non‐Newtonian lid‐driven cavity flows; and (v) a gas‐solid flow in a bubbling fluidized bed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…According to Leonard , a bounded second and/or third‐order accurate upwinding scheme within the CBC region of Gaskell and Lau must pass through points O(0, 0), Q(0.5, 0.75), P(1, 1) and with inclination of 0.75 at Q (passing through Q will provide second‐order accuracy and passing through Q with a slope of 0.75 will give third‐order accuracy). Following a similar procedure to that used in Lima et al , the EPUS scheme is derived by assuming that, for 0trueϕ̂U1, the (normalized) convected variable ϕ at a cell interface f (the interface g follows the same procedure) is an eight‐degree polynomial function with coefficients a k , k = 0,1,...,8, and for trueϕ̂UMathClass-rel∉[0MathClass-punc,1], it corresponds to the first‐order upwind scheme ()trueϕ̂fMathClass-rel=trueϕ̂U. Fixing a 3 as a free parameter (here denoted as λ ), the other coefficients are determined by imposing the Leonard's conditions together with the (C 2 ) continuously differentiable conditions trueϕ̂fMathClass-rel′(0)MathClass-rel=trueϕ̂fMathClass-rel′(1)MathClass-rel=1 and trueϕ̂fMathClass-rel′MathClass-rel′(0)MathClass-rel=trueϕ̂fMathClass-rel′MathClass-rel′(1)MathClass-rel=0.…”
Section: Computational Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations