Abstract:In this paper, cementation
(metal displacement) reactions are discussed in terms of Evans diagrams, i.e.
diagrams constructed by the superposition of cathodic and anodic polarization
curves. The conditions under which the rate of a cementation reaction will be
controlled by cation diffusion to the reacting metal surface or some chemical
step at the surface are explored. It is found that for the case in which the
effective cathodic and anodic areas are approximately equal, the cementation is
likely to be diffus… Show more
“…In essence, only a smooth, coherent deposit can inhibit the cementation reaction. According to Power and Ritchie [40], cementation reactions whose constituent half-reactions has electrode potentials which differ by greater than 0.36 V are likely to be diffusion-controlled (Table 1). As recalled above the diffusion is favoured by the porous nature of the metallic deposit which is additionally electronic conductive and constitute a path for electron transport.…”
Section: Nature Of the Diffusion Layer On Reducing Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1)) is precipitated from solution and replaced by a metal higher in the electromotive series (M m+ 1 -Eq. (2)) [39][40][41][42][43][44][45]. Cementation, also known as contact reduction or metal displacement, is necessarily a spontaneous heterogeneous reaction ( G 0 < 0) that takes place through the galvanic cell M 0 1 /M m+ 1 /M n+ /M (Eq.…”
Section: Cementation and Its Use In The Hydrometallurgymentioning
The further development of Fe(0)-based remediation technology depends on the profound understanding of the mechanisms involved in the process of aqueous contaminant removal. The view that adsorption and co-precipitation are the fundamental contaminant removal mechanisms is currently facing a harsh scepticism. Results from electrochemical cementation are used to bring new insights in the process of contaminant removal in Fe(0)/H(2)O systems. The common feature of hydrometallurgical cementation and metal-based remediation is the heterogeneous nature of the processes which inevitably occurs in the presence of a surface scale. The major difference between both processes is that the surface of remediation metals is covered by layers of own oxide(s) while the surface of the reducing metal in covered by porous layers of the cemented metal. The porous cemented metal is necessarily electronic conductive and favours further dissolution of the reducing metal. For the remediation metal, neither a porous layer nor a conductive layer could be warrant. Therefore, the continuation of the remediation process depends on the long-term porosity of oxide scales on the metal surfaces. These considerations rationalized the superiority of Fe(0) as remediation agent compared to thermodynamically more favourable Al(0) and Zn(0). The validity of the adsorption/co-precipitation concept is corroborated.
“…In essence, only a smooth, coherent deposit can inhibit the cementation reaction. According to Power and Ritchie [40], cementation reactions whose constituent half-reactions has electrode potentials which differ by greater than 0.36 V are likely to be diffusion-controlled (Table 1). As recalled above the diffusion is favoured by the porous nature of the metallic deposit which is additionally electronic conductive and constitute a path for electron transport.…”
Section: Nature Of the Diffusion Layer On Reducing Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1)) is precipitated from solution and replaced by a metal higher in the electromotive series (M m+ 1 -Eq. (2)) [39][40][41][42][43][44][45]. Cementation, also known as contact reduction or metal displacement, is necessarily a spontaneous heterogeneous reaction ( G 0 < 0) that takes place through the galvanic cell M 0 1 /M m+ 1 /M n+ /M (Eq.…”
Section: Cementation and Its Use In The Hydrometallurgymentioning
The further development of Fe(0)-based remediation technology depends on the profound understanding of the mechanisms involved in the process of aqueous contaminant removal. The view that adsorption and co-precipitation are the fundamental contaminant removal mechanisms is currently facing a harsh scepticism. Results from electrochemical cementation are used to bring new insights in the process of contaminant removal in Fe(0)/H(2)O systems. The common feature of hydrometallurgical cementation and metal-based remediation is the heterogeneous nature of the processes which inevitably occurs in the presence of a surface scale. The major difference between both processes is that the surface of remediation metals is covered by layers of own oxide(s) while the surface of the reducing metal in covered by porous layers of the cemented metal. The porous cemented metal is necessarily electronic conductive and favours further dissolution of the reducing metal. For the remediation metal, neither a porous layer nor a conductive layer could be warrant. Therefore, the continuation of the remediation process depends on the long-term porosity of oxide scales on the metal surfaces. These considerations rationalized the superiority of Fe(0) as remediation agent compared to thermodynamically more favourable Al(0) and Zn(0). The validity of the adsorption/co-precipitation concept is corroborated.
“…The limiting step can thus be determined by using techniques such as Evans' diagrams for corrosion reactions as proposed by Power and Ritchie [25] and recently used by Alemany et al [20] or Jeffrey et al [26]. In all cases the operating cementation point (E cem ; i ¼ 0) is located on the Cd(II) diffusion plateau of the reduction wave with and without US.…”
Section: Prediction Of Limiting Step Through Evans' Diagramsmentioning
This paper describes the impact of low frequency (20 kHz) ultrasound (US) on Cd(II)/Zn cementation implemented on a RDE geometry. With and without US the reaction is mass-transfer controlled with two-step first-order kinetics mainly connected to deposit evolution. US improves the kinetics but to a lower extent than expected from electrochemical Cd(II) reduction. The favourable turbulence enhancement due to the deposit without US is not present when applying US because the deposit is continually removed from the surface. The influence of parameters such as temperature, initial concentration of reactants and US power is also analysed.
“…The first involves the recovery of metals from leach solution [2,3] and the second is concerned with the purification of electrolyte solution to remove metals that are more electropositive than the metal to be deposited, e.g., Co, Ni, Cd from ZnSO 4 electrolyte [4][5][6]. Many applications have been reported in industry [6][7][8][9][10] for the recovery of metals and purification of electrolyte solution. Almost all the authors have reported that the rate of the cementation reaction at room temperature is diffusioncontrolled [1,5,11].…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.